Spinal cord stimulation combined with exercise in patients diagnosed with persistent spinal pain syndrome. Study protocol for a randomized control trial

被引:0
|
作者
Vicente-Mampel, J. [1 ]
Falaguera-Vera, F. [1 ]
Sanchez-Poveda, D. [2 ]
Hernandez-Zaballos, F. [2 ]
Martinez-Soler, M. [1 ]
Blanco-Gimenez, P. [1 ]
Sanchez-Montero, F. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Valencia, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Torrent, Valencia, Spain
[2] Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca CAUSA, Anesthesiol Serv, Pain Unit, Salamanca, Spain
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 10期
关键词
FAILED BACK SURGERY; CATASTROPHIZING SCALE; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; DISABILITY INDEX; SPANISH VERSION; UNITED-STATES; VALIDATION; INDIVIDUALS; CONSENSUS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0309935
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Administration of spinal cord stimulation to individuals with PSPS-T1/2 may induce supraspinal descending activation. Similarly, exercise is recognized as a fundamental aspect of spinal pain management. Studies have demonstrated its impact on neurophysiological factors, including the release of spinal and supraspinal beta-endorphins, which activate mu-opioid receptors. Therefore, the purpose of this study will be to examine the effect of SCS in combination with lumbo-pelvic stability core training on perceived low back pain, quality of life and disability in PSPS-T2 patients.Methods/Materials A double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) has been designed. All participants will be randomized from a pre-set sequence. The intervention design has been elaborated from the CONSORT guidelines. This study has been registered at Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT06272539). Sample size was calculated using G Power (R) Sample size software (University of D & uuml;sseldorf). The calculation was based on a moderate effect size of 0.7 (partial eta 2 = 0.70, alpha = .05, power = 0.95), resulting in a total of 40 patients. Assuming a 30% dropout rate, 52 participants will be recruited in total. Two sessions per week will be scheduled for 8 weeks with a total of 16 sessions. Each work session will have a duration of 60 minutes. The exercise will be adapted according to the phases based on the results already published, limiting in each phase the degrees of flexion and extension of the spine to avoid the risk of electrode migration. Primary outcomes will be functionality, satisfaction, strength, psychosocial variables, quality of life and pain perception.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pain and Interoceptive Awareness Outcomes of Chronic Pain Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Park, Yunseo Linda
    Hunter, Jared
    Sheldon, Breanna L.
    Sabourin, Shelby
    DiMarzio, Marisa
    Khazen, Olga
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (08): : 1357 - 1362
  • [42] Benefit of spinal cord stimulation for patients with central poststroke pain: a retrospective multicenter study
    Hosomi, Koichi
    Yamamoto, Takamitsu
    Agari, Takashi
    Takeshita, Shinichiro
    Tanei, Takafumi
    Imoto, Hirochika
    Mori, Nobuhiko
    Oshino, Satoru
    Kurisu, Kaoru
    Kishima, Haruhiko
    Saitoh, Youichi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 136 (02) : 601 - 612
  • [43] Multicentre, clinical trial of burst spinal cord stimulation for neck and upper limb pain NU-BURST: a trial protocol
    Adnan Al-Kaisy
    Girish Vajramani
    Sarah Love-Jones
    Nikunj K. Patel
    Jonathan Royds
    Stefano Palmisani
    David Pang
    Samuel Wesley
    Hyun-Joo Park
    Adil Raza
    Filippo Agnesi
    Neurological Sciences, 2021, 42 : 3285 - 3296
  • [44] Spinal cord stimulation and failed back surgery syndrome. Clinical results with laminectomy electrodes
    Garcia March, Guillermo
    Bordes, Vicente
    Roldan, Pedro
    Real, Luis
    Gonzalez Darder, Jose Manuel
    NEUROCIRUGIA, 2015, 26 (02): : 78 - 83
  • [45] Evaluating Spinal Cord Stimulation as a Therapeutic Strategy for Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Retrospective Observational Study
    Li, Yun
    Chen, Yang
    Wei, Guangfu
    Wang, Shengtao
    Sun, Tao
    Zhao, Xuli
    NEUROMODULATION, 2025, 28 (02): : 341 - 347
  • [46] Multicentre, clinical trial of burst spinal cord stimulation for neck and upper limb pain NU-BURST: a trial protocol
    Al-Kaisy, Adnan
    Vajramani, Girish
    Love-Jones, Sarah
    Patel, Nikunj K.
    Royds, Jonathan
    Palmisani, Stefano
    Pang, David
    Wesley, Samuel
    Park, Hyun-Joo
    Raza, Adil
    Agnesi, Filippo
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 42 (08) : 3285 - 3296
  • [47] A prospective, randomized study of spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome
    North, RB
    Kidd, DH
    Piantadosi, S
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 84 (02) : 839 - 839
  • [48] Influence of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Insulin Sensitivity in Chronic Pain Patients
    Morgalla, Matthias H.
    Fritschle, Hannah
    Vosseler, Andreas
    Benkendorff, Charlotte
    Lamprinou, Apostolia
    Heni, Martin
    Fritsche, Andreas
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 2022, 130 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [49] Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation Parameters in Patients with Predominant Back Pain
    Tiede, Jeffrey
    Brown, Lora
    Gekht, Gennady
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Yearwood, Thomas
    Morgan, Donna
    NEUROMODULATION, 2013, 16 (04): : 370 - 375
  • [50] Spinal Cord Stimulation and Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy: Combined Neuromodulation for Treatment of Advanced Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
    Goto, Shinichi
    Taira, Takaomi
    Horisawa, Shiro
    Yokote, Akiyoshi
    Sasaki, Toshiyuki
    Okada, Yoshikazu
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 91 (06) : 386 - 391