Free-Hand Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Duodenal Subepithelial Lesions

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Peirong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Zuqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Li [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Qu, Yifan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Chenchao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xiang, Anyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Su, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tan, Tao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Jiyuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yao, Lu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Meidong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhong, Yunshi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Quanlin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Pinghong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hu, Hao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Endoscopy Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Endoscopy Res Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai Collaborat Innovat Ctr Endoscopy, Endoscopy Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Shanghai Sci & Technol, Sch Hlth Sci & Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
complications; duodenal neoplasms; endoscopic mucosal resection; endoscopy; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; CLASSIFICATION; CLOSURE; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1111/jgh.16878
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim: This work aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of free-hand endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for duodenal subepithelial lesions (SELs). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 105 patients with duodenal SELs who underwent free-hand EFTR. Free-hand EFTR means no other devices (over-the-scope clip or full-thickness resection device) are required. The preoperative baseline data, procedure-related characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: The technical success rate was 99.0%, and the en bloc resection rate was 94.2%. A total of nine (8.7%) patients experienced major postoperative adverse events (AEs). The incidence of major AEs was significantly higher for lesions with a maximum diameter >= 2 cm (30.4%) than for lesions with a maximum diameter < 2 cm (2.6%) (p < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the incidence of major AEs for peri-ampullary lesions (37.5%), bulb lesions (4.8%), bulb-descending junction lesions (6.7%), and descending part lesions (12.5%) (p = 0.032). Multivariable regression analyses revealed that the maximum diameter >= 2 cm (OR = 18.108; 95% CI = 1.881-174.281; p = 0.012) and lesions located in peri-ampullary (OR = 18.950; 95% CI = 1.219-294.648; p = 0.036) were independent risk factors for major AEs. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 36.6 +/- 21.3 months, and only one patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumors recurred. Conclusions: Free-hand EFTR is a safe and effective technique for nonampullary duodenal SELs with a maximum diameter of < 2 cm. Given the complexity of the duodenal anatomy, this procedure should be performed by experienced endoscopists.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 916
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Current Status of Exposed Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection and Further Development of Non-Exposed Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection
    Mori, Hirohito
    Rahman, Asadur
    Kobara, Hideki
    Fujihara, Shintaro
    Nishiyama, Noriko
    Ayaki, Maki
    Matsunaga, Tae
    Murakami, Masanori
    Masaki, Tsumomu
    DIGESTION, 2017, 95 (01) : 6 - 15
  • [32] Colon Sparing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Advanced Colorectal Lesions: Is It Time for Global Adoption?
    Wu, Zhong-Wei
    Ding, Chao-Hui
    Song, Yao-Dong
    Cui, Zong-Chao
    Bi, Xiu-Qian
    Cheng, Bo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [33] Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic full-thickness resection
    Mori, Hirohito
    Kobara, Hideki
    Nishiyama, Noriko
    Masaki, Tsutomu
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 30 : 25 - 31
  • [34] Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection of a Colonic Lateral Spreading Tumor
    Bucalau, Ana-Maria
    Lemmers, Arnaud
    Arvanitakis, Marianna
    Blero, Daniel
    Neuhaus, Horst
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2018, 36 (03) : 252 - 256
  • [35] Advanced Endoscopic Resection Techniques: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection
    Phillip S. Ge
    Hiroyuki Aihara
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2022, 67 : 1521 - 1538
  • [36] Advanced Endoscopic Resection Techniques: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection
    Ge, Phillip S.
    Aihara, Hiroyuki
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2022, 67 (05) : 1521 - 1538
  • [37] Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Colorectal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    McKechnie, Tyler
    Govind, Shaylan
    Lee, Jay
    Lee, Yung
    Hong, Dennis
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 280 : 440 - 449
  • [38] A Real-World Promising Result of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection: It's Time for Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection to Be Widely Used
    Chu, Yuan
    Xu, Meidong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 (12) : 1972 - 1973
  • [39] Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dolan, Russell D.
    Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat
    McCarty, Thomas R.
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    Aihara, Hiroyuki
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (02) : 216 - +
  • [40] Minimally invasive surgery for resection of duodenal carcinoid tumors: endoscopic full-thickness resection under laparoscopic observation
    Hironori Tsujimoto
    Takashi Ichikura
    Shigeaki Nagao
    Tomoki Sato
    Satoshi Ono
    Satoshi Aiko
    Shuichi Hiraki
    Yoshihisa Yaguchi
    Naoko Sakamoto
    Takemaru Tanimizu
    Junji Yamamoto
    Kazuo Hase
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 471 - 475