Free-Hand Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Duodenal Subepithelial Lesions

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Peirong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Zuqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Li [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Qu, Yifan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Chenchao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xiang, Anyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Su, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tan, Tao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Jiyuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yao, Lu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Meidong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhong, Yunshi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Quanlin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Pinghong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hu, Hao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Endoscopy Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Endoscopy Res Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai Collaborat Innovat Ctr Endoscopy, Endoscopy Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Shanghai Sci & Technol, Sch Hlth Sci & Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
complications; duodenal neoplasms; endoscopic mucosal resection; endoscopy; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; CLASSIFICATION; CLOSURE; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1111/jgh.16878
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim: This work aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of free-hand endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for duodenal subepithelial lesions (SELs). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 105 patients with duodenal SELs who underwent free-hand EFTR. Free-hand EFTR means no other devices (over-the-scope clip or full-thickness resection device) are required. The preoperative baseline data, procedure-related characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: The technical success rate was 99.0%, and the en bloc resection rate was 94.2%. A total of nine (8.7%) patients experienced major postoperative adverse events (AEs). The incidence of major AEs was significantly higher for lesions with a maximum diameter >= 2 cm (30.4%) than for lesions with a maximum diameter < 2 cm (2.6%) (p < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the incidence of major AEs for peri-ampullary lesions (37.5%), bulb lesions (4.8%), bulb-descending junction lesions (6.7%), and descending part lesions (12.5%) (p = 0.032). Multivariable regression analyses revealed that the maximum diameter >= 2 cm (OR = 18.108; 95% CI = 1.881-174.281; p = 0.012) and lesions located in peri-ampullary (OR = 18.950; 95% CI = 1.219-294.648; p = 0.036) were independent risk factors for major AEs. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 36.6 +/- 21.3 months, and only one patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumors recurred. Conclusions: Free-hand EFTR is a safe and effective technique for nonampullary duodenal SELs with a maximum diameter of < 2 cm. Given the complexity of the duodenal anatomy, this procedure should be performed by experienced endoscopists.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 916
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Subepithelial tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract Endoscopic tunnel resection, endoscopic full-thickness resection or only surveillance?
    Meier, Benjamin
    Caca, Karel
    GASTROENTEROLOGE, 2022, 17 (02): : 103 - 108
  • [22] Safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection for the treatment of duodenal subepithelial lesions
    Li, Chen
    Chu, Yi
    Lv, Liang
    Wang, Xuehong
    Yu, Meihong
    Tan, Yuyong
    Liu, Deliang
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (02) : 856 - 863
  • [23] Overcoming the Challenge of Full-Thickness Resection of Gastric Lesions Using a Colonic Full-Thickness Resection Device
    Fahmawi, Yazan
    Krutika, Patel
    Kumar, Manoj
    Merritt, Lindsey
    Mizrahi, Meir
    ACG CASE REPORTS JOURNAL, 2020, 7 (03)
  • [24] Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece
    Velegraki, Magdalini
    Trikola, Artemis
    Vasiliadis, Konstantinos
    Fragaki, Maria
    Mpitouli, Afroditi
    Dimas, Ioannis
    Voudoukis, Evangelos
    Giannikaki, Elpida
    Kapranou, Amalia
    Kordelas, Athanasios
    Stefanidis, Gerasimos
    Paspatis, Gregorios A.
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 32 (05): : 482 - 488
  • [25] Combined surgical and endoscopic approaches to full-thickness resection
    Tsai, Thomas C.
    Meireles, Ozanan R.
    TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 21 (01) : 26 - 32
  • [26] Subepithelial tumors: How does endoscopic full-thickness resection & submucosal tunneling with endoscopic resection compare with laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery?
    Kahaleh, Michel
    Bhagat, Vicky
    Dellatore, Peter
    Tyberg, Amy
    Sarkar, Avik
    Shahid, Haroon M.
    Andalib, Iman
    Alkhiari, Resheed
    Gaidhane, Monica
    Kedia, Prashant
    Nieto, Jose
    Kumta, Nikhil A.
    Dixon, Rebekah E.
    Salameh, Habeeb
    Mavrogenis, Georgios
    Bassioukas, Stefanos
    Abe, Seiichiro
    Arentes, Vitor N.
    Morita, Flavio H.
    Sakai, Paulo
    de Moura, Eduardo G.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (11) : E1491 - E1496
  • [27] Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumour Resection with a New Duodenal Full-Thickness Resection Device
    Cortez-Pinto, Joao
    de Ferro, Susana Mao
    Castela, Joana
    Claro, Isabel
    Chaves, Paula
    Pereira, Antonio Dias
    GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 27 (04) : 290 - 292
  • [28] Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection with the Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) for "difficult to resect" colonic lesions. A single-center experience
    Bisogni, Damiano
    Talamucci, Luca
    Rossi, Michele
    Cianchi, Fabio
    Staderini, Fabio
    Boni, Luca
    Baria, Enrico
    Fortuna, Laura
    Manetti, Roberto
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2020, 91 (05) : 486 - 493
  • [29] Efficacy and Safety of Full-thickness Resection Device (FTRD) for Colorectal Lesions Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fahmawi, Yazan
    Hanjar, Abrahim
    Ahmed, Yasir
    Abdalhadi, Haneen
    Mulekar, Madhuri S.
    Merritt, Lindsey
    Kumar, Manoj
    Mizrahi, Meir
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 55 (04) : E27 - E36
  • [30] Endoscopic full-thickness resection with laparoscopic assistance
    Folkert, Ian W.
    Roses, Robert E.
    TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 17 (03) : 112 - 114