Computer-assisted morphology training of reading with grade 2 and grade 3 poor readers

被引:0
作者
Kronberg, Nea [1 ,2 ]
Aro, Mikko [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Eklund, Kenneth [5 ]
Lehecka, Tomas [6 ]
Vataja, Pia [1 ,2 ]
Salmi, Paula [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Educ, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[2] Niilo Maki Inst, POB 29, FIN-40101 Jyvaskyla, Finland
[3] Univ Jyvaskyla, Ctr Excellence Learning Dynam & Intervent Res Inte, Turku, Finland
[4] Univ Turku, Turku, Finland
[5] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Educ & Psychol, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[6] Abo Akad Univ, Fac Arts Psychol & Theol, Turku, Finland
[7] Univ Helsinki, Fac Med, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Intervention; Morphology training; Poor readers; Reading; LITERACY ACHIEVEMENT; EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION; SCHOOL-AGE; FOLLOW-UP; AWARENESS; ACQUISITION; DYSLEXIA; CHILDREN; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11145-024-10605-9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Explicit morphology instruction has been recommended for poor readers. Still, hardly any studies have compared the effectiveness of both explicit and implicit morphology training in relation to business-as-usual support in improving reading proficiency. In this study, 277 poor readers in Grades 2 and 3 participated in a computer-assisted eight-week intervention focusing on suffixes in a randomised control trial, with pre-, post- and follow-up assessment in schools for Swedish-speaking children in Finland. Students were randomly allocated into two experimental groups and one control group. The first experimental group played a digital game with explicit instruction in lexical morphology (explicit). The other experimental group played the game without said instruction (implicit). Intervention and Grade effects were analysed using mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA). A significant time x group intervention effect was found only in the implicit vs. control group comparison between pre- and post-assessments; a moderate gain in identification of trained words assessed in a game-like manner was found in the implicit group unlike in controls. The difference in gain remained significant at follow-up for both grades. Additionally, third graders in the implicit group demonstrated a more significant improvement than controls in reading aloud pseudowords with trained suffixes, both in the pre-post comparison and at follow-up. Results suggest that poor readers benefitted from implicit morphology training, but explicit instruction in lexical morphology (animations with verbal explanations) did not have a significant effect on reading proficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:42
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Educational Psychology, DOI DOI 10.1080/0144341042000271719
[2]  
Arnbak E., 2000, SCAND J EDUC RES, V44, P229, DOI DOI 10.1080/00313830050154485
[3]   Learning to read: English in comparison to six more regular orthographies [J].
Aro, M ;
Wimmer, H .
APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2003, 24 (04) :621-635
[4]  
Aro M., 2005, Handbook of orthography and literacy, P531
[5]   Effects of a morpheme-based training procedure on the literacy skills of readers with a reading disability [J].
Bar-Kochva, Irit ;
Korinth, Sebastian Peter ;
Hasselhorn, Marcus .
APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2020, 41 (05) :1061-1082
[6]   Tier 3 specialized writing instruction for students with dyslexia [J].
Berninger, Virginia W. ;
Winn, William D. ;
Stock, Patricia ;
Abbott, Robert D. ;
Eschen, Kate ;
Lin, Shin-Ju ;
Garcia, Noelia ;
Anderson-Youngstrom, Marci ;
Murphy, Heather ;
Lovitt, Dan ;
Trivedi, Pamala ;
Jones, Janine ;
Amtmann, Dagmar ;
Nagy, William .
READING AND WRITING, 2008, 21 (1-2) :95-129
[7]  
Borin L, 2012, LREC 2012 - EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, P474
[8]   Measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: a narrative review [J].
Borleffs, Elisabeth ;
Maassen, Ben A. M. ;
Lyytinen, Heikki ;
Zwarts, Frans .
READING AND WRITING, 2017, 30 (08) :1617-1638
[9]   The Effects of Morphological Instruction on Literacy Skills: A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Bowers, Peter N. ;
Kirby, John R. ;
Deacon, S. Helene .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 80 (02) :144-179
[10]  
Bryant P., 2006, Handbook of orthography and literacy, P601