Minimally invasive left pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: review of the current literature

被引:0
|
作者
De Pastena, Matteo [1 ]
Coppola, Alessandro
Esposito, Alessandro
Casciani, Fabio
Tufo, Andrea
Salvia, Roberto
机构
[1] Univ & Hosp Trust Verona, Pancreas Inst, Gen & Pancreat Surg Dept, PLe Scuro 10, I-37134 Verona, Italy
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; robotic distal pancreatectomy; pancreaticresection; OPEN DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; SURGERY; CANCER; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.20517/2574-1225.2023.123
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The minimally invasive approach has gained popularity in the last decades, even in complex abdominal surgerysuch as pancreatic resections. Currently, many meta-analyses focus on the benefits and advantages of the minimally invasive approach compared to open surgery, especially during left pancreatectomy (LP). Limited data on the oncological outcomes are available. The review aims to describe the surgical and oncological outcomes of the minimally invasive left pancreatectomy (MILP). The search terms were based on the final histologicalpathology (pancreatic adenocarcinoma) and the comparison of different surgical approaches (openvs. minimallyinvasive). The search strategy was constructed in PubMed and adapted to run across other database platforms,focusing on studies published until 2022. A total of 2,878 studies were selected and duplicates were removed.After title and abstract screening, 109 articles remained for full-text assessment, of which 28 met the eligibilitycriteria for this systematic review. Considering the study design, the studies were divided into retrospective (n = 15), prospective (n = 4), and 13 propensity score-matched (n = 9). The present review of the literature suggeststhat MILP is technically feasible and safe for treating body and tail pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).MILP did not have any impact on the major complications, reducing hospitalization. Regarding the oncologicaloutcomes, the surgical technique did not have an impact on the R0 resection rate, lymph node harvested rate, use of adjuvant chemotherapy, and overall survival. Further prospective randomized trials remain indicated to assess the oncological impact of the MILP in patients with PDAC
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Pancreatectomy for Cancer: A Critical Review of the Current Literature
    Trenton L. Place
    Peter Nau
    James J. Mezhir
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2015, 19 : 375 - 386
  • [2] Minimally Invasive Pancreatectomy for Cancer: A Critical Review of the Current Literature
    Place, Trenton L.
    Nau, Peter
    Mezhir, James J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (02) : 375 - 386
  • [3] Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA)
    van Hilst, Jony
    de Rooij, Thijs
    Klompmaker, Sjors
    Rawashdeh, Majd
    Aleotti, Francesca
    Al-Sarireh, Bilal
    Alseidi, Adnan
    Ateeb, Zeeshan
    Balzano, Gianpaolo
    Berrevoet, Frederik
    Bjornsson, Bergthor
    Boggi, Ugo
    Busch, Olivier R.
    Butturini, Giovanni
    Casadei, Riccardo
    Del Chiaro, Marco
    Chikhladze, Sophia
    Cipriani, Federica
    van Dam, Ronald
    Damoli, Isacco
    van Dieren, Susan
    Dokmak, Safi
    Edwin, Bjorn
    van Eijck, Casper
    Fabre, Jean-Marie
    Falconi, Massimo
    Farges, Olivier
    Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano
    Forgione, Antonello
    Frigerio, Isabella
    Fuks, David
    Gavazzi, Francesca
    Gayet, Brice
    Giardino, Alessandro
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    Hackert, Thilo
    Hassenpflug, Matthias
    Kabir, Irfan
    Keck, Tobias
    Khatkov, Igor
    Kusar, Masa
    Lombardo, Carlo
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Marshall, Ryne
    Menon, Krish V.
    Montorsi, Marco
    Orville, Marion
    de Pastena, Matteo
    Pietrabissa, Andrea
    Poves, Ignaci
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [4] Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive and Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Magge, Deepa
    Gooding, William
    Choudry, Haroon
    Steve, Jennifer
    Steel, Jennifer
    Zureikat, Amer
    Krasinskas, Alyssa
    Daouadi, Mustapha
    Lee, Kenneth K. W.
    Hughes, Steven J.
    Zeh, Herbert J., III
    Moser, A. James
    JAMA SURGERY, 2013, 148 (06) : 525 - 531
  • [5] The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Du-Jiang
    Xiong, Jun-Jie
    Lu, Hui-Min
    Wei, Yi
    Zhang, Ling
    Lu, Shan
    Hu, Wei-Ming
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [6] Radioimmunotherapy of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Review of the Current Status of Literature
    Hull, Ashleigh
    Li, Yanrui
    Bartholomeusz, Dylan
    Hsieh, William
    Allen, Barry
    Bezak, Eva
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [7] Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    van Hilst, Jony
    Korrel, Maarten
    de Rooij, Thijs
    Lof, Sanne
    Busch, Olivier R.
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    Kooby, David A.
    van Dieren, Susan
    Abu Hilal, Mo
    Besselink, Marc G.
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (05): : 719 - 727
  • [8] The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Du-Jiang Yang
    Jun-Jie Xiong
    Hui-Min Lu
    Yi Wei
    Ling Zhang
    Shan Lu
    Wei-Ming Hu
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [9] Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review
    Kakati, Rasha T.
    Naffouje, Samer
    Spanheimer, Philip M.
    Dahdaleh, Fadi S.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [10] Reduced morbidity with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Plotkin, Anastasia
    Ceppa, Eugene P.
    Zarzaur, Ben L.
    Kilbane, Elizabeth M.
    Riall, Taylor S.
    Pitt, Henry A.
    HPB, 2017, 19 (03) : 279 - 285