Mammography screening: Eliciting the voices of informed citizens

被引:0
作者
Jensen, Manja D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hansen, Kasper M. [4 ]
Siersma, Volkert [1 ,2 ]
Brodersen, John [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Sect Gen Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Reg Zealand, Primary Hlth Care Res Unit, Roskilde, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Polit Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
PLOS ONE | 2025年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; BENEFITS; HARMS; INFORMATION; RECOMMENDATIONS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0317263
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Many medical organisations recommend continuing with existing mammography screening programmes but some recommend stopping or de-intensifying them. In Denmark women aged 50-69 are offered biennial mammograms free-of-charge. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine whether or not an informed public would recommend continuation of the Danish mammography screening programme, and to determine whether this recommendation was in line with what participants considered to be acceptable levels of mortality reduction and overdiagnosis. Methods A Deliberative Poll on mammography screening was held online in Denmark and 89 citizens participated. They were representative of the general population on sociodemographic parameters, attitudes towards and knowledge of mammography screening. Participants studied a video about the programme and took part in an online citizens' assembly where they deliberated with peers and experts in the field. All participants answered a survey at four time points: at recruitment; after video information; after deliberation, and a month after the assembly. Results Questionnaire data revealed that many participants were influenced by the deliberative polling process as 36%, changed their recommendation afterwards. At recruitment, 72% of participants strongly supported the continuation of mammography screening. This proportion was lower after the presentation of video information (55%), after deliberation (65%), and a month after the assembly (58%). Interestingly, these changes in recommendation were not correlated to changes in knowledge. The proportion of participants who recommended continuation following what they stated were acceptable rates of mortality reduction and overdiagnosis rose from 21% at recruitment to 40% after information and deliberation. Most participants (60%), therefore, made a recommendation that was not in line with levels of mortality reduction and overdiagnosis that they felt were acceptable. Conclusion After video information and deliberation participants were less supportive of the mammography screening programme compared to their immediate recommendation at the beginning of the process.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] 'I just want to be able to make a choice': Results from citizen deliberations about mammography screening in Ontario, Canada
    Abelson, Julia
    Tripp, Laura
    Sussman, Jonathan
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2018, 122 (12) : 1364 - 1371
  • [2] Uncertain times: A survey of Canadian women's perspectives toward mammography screening
    Abelson, Julia
    Tripp, Laura
    Brouwers, Melissa C.
    Pond, Gregory
    Sussman, Jonathan
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 112 : 209 - 215
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Annual Report 2019
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, Patient and public Involvement Policy
  • [5] How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain
    Baena-Canada, Jose M.
    Luque-Ribelles, Violeta
    Quilez-Cutillas, Alicia
    Rosado-Varela, Petra
    Benitez-Rodriguez, Encarnacion
    Marquez-Calderon, Soledad
    Manuel Rivera-Bautista, Juan
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (05):
  • [6] Reform of the National Screening Mammography Program in France
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Jorgensen, Karsten Juhl
    Autier, Philippe
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (02) : 177 - 178
  • [7] Cost implications of routine mammography screening of women 50-69 years in the County of Funen, Denmark
    Bech, M
    Gyrd-Hansen, D
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2000, 54 (02) : 125 - 141
  • [8] Benhabib Seyla., 1996, DEMOCRACY DIFFERENCE, P67, DOI DOI 10.1515/9780691234168-005
  • [9] Abolishing Mammography Screening Programs? A View from the Swiss Medical Board
    Biller-Andorno, Nikola
    Jueni, Peter
    Kalager, Mette
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (21) : 1965 - 1967
  • [10] cndp, Center for New Democratic Processes