Systems literacy: towards a conspectus and model for environmental and sustainability education

被引:2
作者
Demirci, Sinem [1 ,2 ]
Reid, Alan [3 ]
Teksoz, Gaye [1 ]
Sahin, Elvan [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Math & Sci Educ, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Stat Dept, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
[3] Monash Univ, Fac Educ, Sch Curriculum Teaching & Inclus Educ, Melbourne, Australia
关键词
Systems literacy; systems thinking; Sustainable Development Goals; complex adaptive systems; conceptual model; SDG 4: Quality education; SCIENTIFIC LITERACY; COMPLEX-SYSTEMS; THINKING SKILLS; STUDENTS; SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; DYNAMICS; COMPETENCE; DISCOURSE;
D O I
10.1080/13504622.2024.2409959
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Through Target 4.7 of SDG4 on 'quality education', Agenda 2030 invites governments to take ownership of progress towards ensuring 'Education for Sustainable Development' (ESD) becomes embedded into all levels of education. However, conceptual analysis suggests an ongoing blindspot related to the significance of systems literacy in fostering the many learning outcomes associated with the broader sweep of 'education for the Sustainable Development Goals'. These include (i) the challenges of providing learners with explicit support for key cross-cutting sustainability competencies that integrate cognitive, socio-emotional, and behavioural domains, and (ii) ensuring citizens can move beyond acquiring basic familiarity with elements of systems thinking towards engaging in authentic lifelong learning about 'healthy' and 'problematic' systems, including their prominence and sustainability within society at large. The analysis offered in this 'long form' article helps address such challenges by reviewing key conceptions of systems literacy. It also proposes a model based on weaving together three literacy elements familiar to environmental and sustainability education (ESE): the functional, cultural, and critical. The article concludes with illustrations of the model in terms of its implications for practices of ESE, and a discussion of the model's potential for supporting efforts that further constructive engagement by educators with the SDGs. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 891
页数:36
相关论文
共 235 条
  • [31] Checkland P., 1981, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
  • [32] Cochran-Smith M, 2014, TEACH COLL REC, V116
  • [33] Ecoliteracy and the trouble with reading: ecoliteracy considered in terms of Goethe's 'delicate empiricism' and the potential for reading in the book of nature
    Code, Jonathan M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2019, 25 (08) : 1267 - 1280
  • [34] Human well-being in the Anthropocene: limits to growth
    Collste, David
    Cornell, Sarah E.
    Randers, Jorgen
    Rockstroem, Johan
    Stoknes, Per Espen
    [J]. GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4
  • [35] Policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: using integrated simulation models to assess effective policies
    Collste, David
    Pedercini, Matteo
    Cornell, Sarah E.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2017, 12 (06) : 921 - 931
  • [36] From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education
    Colucci-Gray, L
    Camino, E
    Barbiero, G
    Gray, D
    [J]. SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2006, 90 (02) : 227 - 252
  • [37] Costanza R, 2007, AMBIO, V36, P522, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[522:SOCWCW]2.0.CO
  • [38] 2
  • [39] Impact of Biofuel Crop Production on the Formation of Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico
    Costello, Christine
    Griffin, W. Michael
    Landis, Amy E.
    Matthews, H. Scott
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (20) : 7985 - 7991
  • [40] Students' Developing Understanding of Water in Environmental Systems
    Covitt, Beth A.
    Gunckel, Kristin L.
    Anderson, Charles W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, 2009, 40 (03) : 37 - 51