A scoping review of middle managers in the digital transformation era in public sector organizations: are they still needed?

被引:0
作者
Kusmaryanto, Sigit [1 ]
Santoso, Claudius Budi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gadjah Mada, Fac Econ & Business, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
来源
COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT | 2025年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
Digital transformation; public sector organizations; middle managers; public administration paradigm; scoping review; ICT; Business; Management and Accounting; Information Technology; Government; Public Administration & Management; Artificial Intelligence; Databases; Information & Communication Technology (ICT); Internet & Multimedia - Computing & IT; Technology; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; GOOGLE-SCHOLAR; STRATEGY; ROLES; SERVICE; WEB; IMPLEMENTATION; AMBIDEXTERITY; INITIATIVES; ANTECEDENTS;
D O I
10.1080/23311975.2025.2461734
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Middle managers play a crucial role in the success or failure of digital transformation programs and are themselves targets of change, particularly in public sector organizations. As intermediaries, they occupy ambiguous, complex, and paradoxical roles, with digital technology often perceived as diminishing their necessity. This study examines the relevance of middle managers in the digital transformation era within public institutions through a scoping review, following a six-stage framework to ensure rigor and transparency. Literature was sourced from databases such as Scopus, EBSCOhost, BASE, Google Scholar, and other search techniques, resulting in 33 works from 1990 to 2023 that met the inclusion criteria. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and assessed study quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The findings indicate a range of middle manager responses to digital transformation, varying from positive to negative, though many feel increasingly empowered and essential to organizational success. Digitalization reshapes their competency and training needs. This study provides practical insights for empowering middle managers in the public sector and suggests avenues for future research within modern public administration contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 177 条
  • [1] Leading change in public organisations: the role of mediators
    Agostino, Deborah
    Arena, Marika
    Arnaboldi, Michela
    [J]. LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (07) : 596 - 615
  • [2] Factors affecting e-government adoption in the UAE public sector organisations: the knowledge management perspective
    Al Sayegh, Ahmed Juma
    Ahmad, Syed Zamberi
    AlFaqeeh, Khadeeja Mohsen
    Singh, Sanjay Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 27 (03) : 717 - 737
  • [3] Alassim M., 2017, International Journal of Information and Communication, V11, P894
  • [4] Almamari M. R. H., 2016, The role of organisational culture in digital government implementation. exploring the relationship between public sector organisational culture and the implementation of digital government in Oman
  • [5] Digital Transformation and Knowledge Management in the Public Sector
    Alvarenga, Ana
    Matos, Florinda
    Godina, Radu
    Matias, Joao C. O.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14)
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2022, E-Government Survey 2022. The Future of Digital Government
  • [7] Examining the digitalisation of virtual enterprises amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic and meta-analysis
    Anthony Jnr, Bokolo
    Abbas Petersen, Sobah
    [J]. ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 15 (05) : 617 - 650
  • [8] From Neo-Weberian to Hybrid Governance Models in Public Administration: Differences between State and Local Self-Government
    Aristovnik, Aleksander
    Murko, Eva
    Ravselj, Dejan
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [9] Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
  • [10] 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review
    Armstrong, Rebecca
    Hall, Belinda J.
    Doyle, Jodie
    Waters, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 33 (01) : 147 - 150