Mapping key soil properties in low relief areas using integrated machine learning and geostatistics

被引:0
作者
Qiu, Jiangheng [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Feng [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Decai [1 ]
Yan, Kun [1 ]
Guo, Junhui [2 ]
Huang, Weijie [1 ]
Feng, Yongkang [1 ]
机构
[1] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Forestry, Zhengzhou 450046, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil Sci, State Key Lab Soil & Sustainable Agr, Nanjing 211135, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[4] Qinghai Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Key Lab Phys Geog & Environm Proc Qinghai Prov, Xining 312366, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Digital soil mapping; Soil texture; Soil organic matter; Soil-landscape model; Geostatistical models; Remote sensing; ORGANIC-CARBON; RANDOM FOREST; REGRESSION; DIFFERENTIATION; MODELS; MATTER; REGION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113228
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Digital soil mapping based on the soil-landscape model can predict soil information using readily available environmental covariates such as topography and vegetation. However, its application in low-relief areas where topographic factors are relatively uniform and vegetation conditions are similar, is challenging. Meanwhile, geostatistical models often have better performance in low relief areas compared to topographically complex areas. Therefore, we hypothesized that the method of combining geostatistical modeling with soil-landscape modelling can achieve higher prediction accuracy. We comprehensively selected multiple environmental covariates suitable for the study area and compared four models: Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Ordinary Kriging (OK), Random Forest (RF), and Random Forest Regression Kriging (RF-RK). These models were used to predict six soil properties (clay, silt, and sand contents, pH, cation exchange capacity, and soil organic matter content) in the study area and evaluate their prediction accuracies. The results were as follows: (1) When the spatial autocorrelation of soil property data was weak, the RF model, which does not consider spatial autocorrelation, yielded more accurate predictions for clay content and soil pH, with R2 of 0.62 and 0.30, and a NRMSE of 0.46 and 0.08, respectively. (2) When the spatial autocorrelation was strong, the RF-RK model, which accounts for both the soil-environment relationship and spatial autocorrelation, provided more accurate results for sand and silt contents, cation exchange capacity, and soil organic matter content. The RF-RK model achieved R2 values of 0.81, 0.82, 0.79, and 0.69, and NRMSE values of 0.14, 0.09, 0.14, and 0.26, respectively. (3) Soil type and distance from the Yangtze River were the most important environmental variables explaining the spatial distribution of soil properties. The spatial heterogeneity of soil type and the geographical influence of the Yangtze River explained soil property variations better than other variables. This study highlights the potential of the integrated modeling approach for digital soil mapping in low relief areas. High-precision spatial maps of key soil attributes in the study area can provide critical data support for land planning and sustainable agricultural development.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Gully Erosion Susceptibility Assessment in the Kondoran Watershed Using Machine Learning Algorithms and the Boruta Feature Selection [J].
Ahmadpour, Hamed ;
Bazrafshan, Ommolbanin ;
Rafiei-Sardooi, Elham ;
Zamani, Hossein ;
Panagopoulos, Thomas .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (18)
[2]   Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions [J].
Belgiu, Mariana ;
Dragut, Lucian .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 114 :24-31
[3]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[4]   Estimation of the spatial rainfall distribution using inverse distance weighting (IDW) in the middle of Taiwan [J].
Chen, Feng-Wen ;
Liu, Chen-Wuing .
PADDY AND WATER ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (03) :209-222
[5]   Digital mapping of GlobalSoilMap soil properties at a broad scale: A review [J].
Chen, Songchao ;
Arrouays, Dominique ;
Mulder, Vera Leatitia ;
Poggio, Laura ;
Minasny, Budiman ;
Roudier, Pierre ;
Libohova, Zamir ;
Lagacherie, Philippe ;
Shi, Zhou ;
Hannam, Jacqueline ;
Meersmans, Jeroen ;
Richer-de-Forges, Anne C. ;
Walter, Christian .
GEODERMA, 2022, 409
[6]  
Cliff A.D., 1981, SPATIAL PROCESSES MO, P1
[7]   Pollution models and inverse distance weighting: Some critical remarks [J].
de Mesnard, Louis .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 52 :459-469
[8]   Digital mapping of soil texture classes using Random Forest classification algorithm [J].
Dharumarajan, Subramanian ;
Hegde, Rajendra .
SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 38 (01) :135-149
[9]   Large-scale spatial variability of eight soil chemical properties within paddy fields [J].
Duan, Liangxia ;
Li, Zhenwei ;
Xie, Hongxia ;
Li, Zhiming ;
Zhang, Liang ;
Zhou, Qing .
CATENA, 2020, 188
[10]   Predicting and Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Northern Iran [J].
Emadi, Mostafa ;
Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, Ruhollah ;
Cherati, Ali ;
Danesh, Majid ;
Mosavi, Amir ;
Scholten, Thomas .
REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (14)