Visibility of mpMRI region of interest on ultrasound during cognitive fusion targeted biopsy predicts prostate cancer detection: a prospective single-center study

被引:0
作者
Qin, Fei [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Zhijian [1 ]
Ma, Jianguo [2 ]
Wu, Jingyun [1 ]
Shen, Qi [1 ]
Liu, Yi [1 ]
Li, Xuesong [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 3, 139 Ziqiang Rd, Shijiazhuang 050000, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostate cancer; Transrectal ultrasound; Targeted biopsy; Hypoechoic lesion; 2014 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; DIAGNOSIS; LESION; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04750-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the nature of ultrasound characteristics during mpMRI/TRUS cognitive fusion targeted biopsy (cTB). Methods From 2023 to 2024, data from 502 lesions in 426 men who underwent targeted combined systematic biopsy were analyzed. All lesions had a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of >= 3. The primary endpoint was the detection rate of prostate cancer (PCa) according to the PI-RADS score/ultrasound characteristics, categorized as benign or invisible (Bi), hypoechoic only (Ho), and hypoechoic with microcalcification (Hm), assessed through cross-stratification. The secondary endpoints included the distribution of ultrasound characteristics across PI-RADS scores, prostate zones, and histological types. Finally, associations between ultrasound characteristics and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis (MVA). Results Among lesions, 233 (46%) were Bi, 210 (42%) Ho, and 59 (12%) Hm. First, Bi lesions had a 64% (103/161) non-cancer rate in PI-RADS 3, while Ho + Hm lesions showed the highest csPCa rate in PI-RADS 5 at 82% (102/124). Additionally, Ho + Hm lesions were predominantly observed in PI-RADS 5 (92% [114/124]) and in the peripheral zone (64% [179/278]). Notably, Hm lesions had a significantly higher percentage of cribriform morphology than Ho lesions (32% vs. 14%, P = 0.001). Finally, MVA confirmed Ho ([Ref Bi] OR 4.95, P < 0.001) and Hm ([Ref Bi] OR 27.7, P < 0.001) as independent predictors of csPCa. Conclusion In cTB, the identification of Ho and Hm lesions on TRUS enhances the diagnostic yield of csPCa by facilitating more precise localization compared to Bi lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:3305 / 3312
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] Microcalcifications, calcium-sensing receptor, and cancer
    Anract, Julien
    Baures, Manon
    Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry
    Capiod, Thierry
    [J]. CELL CALCIUM, 2019, 82
  • [3] Ultrasound and clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis
    Bai, Xiaofang
    Wang, Yunyue
    Song, Ruxi
    Li, Shangan
    Song, Yan
    Wang, Huan
    Tong, Xiaoning
    Wei, Wei
    Ruan, Litao
    Zhao, Qiaoling
    [J]. CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2023, 85 (02) : 147 - 162
  • [4] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [5] Prostate cancer detection rate according to lesion visibility using ultrasound and MRI
    Choi, M. H.
    Lee, Y. J.
    Jung, S. E.
    Lee, J. Y.
    Choi, Y-J
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (06) : 474 - 479
  • [6] EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent
    Cornford, Philip
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Briers, Erik
    van den Broeck, Thomas
    Brunckhorst, Oliver
    Darraugh, Julie
    Eberli, Daniel
    De Meerleer, Gert
    De Santis, Maria
    Farolfi, Andrea
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Gillessen, Silke
    Grivas, Nikolaos
    Henry, Ann M.
    Lardas, Michael
    van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    Liew, Matthew
    Espinos, Estefania Linares
    Oldenburg, Jan
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Roberts, Matthew J.
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Schouten, Natasha
    Smith, Emma J.
    Stranne, Johan
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Willemse, Peter-Paul M.
    Tilki, Derya
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 86 (02) : 148 - 163
  • [7] Beyond Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography PRIMARY Score in a Composite (P) Score for More Accurate Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Emmett, Louise
    Papa, Nathan
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Fendler, Wolfgang
    Calais, Jeremie
    Burger, Irene
    Eiber, Matthias
    Barbato, Francesco
    Moon, Daniel
    Counter, William
    John, Nikeith
    Xue, Alan
    Franklin, Anthony
    Thompson, James
    Rasiah, Kris
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Yaxley, John
    Buteau, James
    Agrawal, Shikha
    Ho, Bao
    Nguyen, Andrew
    Liu, Victor
    Lee, Jonathan
    Woo, Henry
    Hsiao, Edward
    Sutherland, Thomas
    Perry, Elyse
    Stricker, Phillip
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Roberts, Matthew
    Murphy, Declan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 212 (02) : 299 - 309
  • [8] The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study
    Emmett, Louise
    Buteau, James
    Papa, Nathan
    Moon, Daniel
    Thompson, James
    Roberts, Matthew J.
    Rasiah, Kris
    Pattison, David A.
    Yaxley, John
    Thomas, Paul
    Hutton, Anthony C.
    Agrawal, Shikha
    Amin, Amer
    Blazevski, Alexandar
    Chalasani, Venu
    Ho, Bao
    Nguyen, Andrew
    Liu, Victor
    Lee, Jonathan
    Sheehan-Dare, Gemma
    Kooner, Raji
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Chan, Lyn
    Cusick, Thomas
    Namdarian, Benjamin
    Kapoor, Jada
    Alghazo, Omar
    Woo, Henry H.
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Murphy, Declan
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Stricker, Phillip
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (06) : 682 - 689
  • [9] The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Egevad, Lars
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Delahunt, Brett
    Srigley, John R.
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) : 244 - 252
  • [10] Impact of Lesion Visibility on Transrectal Ultrasound on the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 3+4 or Greater) with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsy
    Garcia-Reyes, Kirema
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Zagoria, Ronald J.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Behr, Spencer C.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (03) : 699 - 705