Anoikis-related subtype and prognosis analyses based on bioinformatics, and an expression verification of ANGPTL4 based on experiments of lung adenocarcinoma

Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the most common malignant tumors with high mortality. Anoikis resistance is an important mechanism of tumor cell proliferation and migration. Our research is devoted to exploring the role of anoikis in the diagnosis, classification, and prognosis of LUAD. Methods: We downloaded the expression profile, mutation, and clinical data of LUAD from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The "ConsensusClusterPlus" package was then used for the cluster analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to establish the prognostic model. We verified the reliability of the model using a Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data set. A gene set variation analysis (GSVA) was conducted to investigate the functional enrichment differences in the different clusters and risk groups. The CIBERSORT algorithm and a single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) were used to analyze immune cell infiltration. The tumor mutation burden (TMB) and Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) scores were used to evaluate the patients' sensitivity to immunotherapy. Immunohistochemical staining of tissue microarrays was used to verify the correlation between ANGPTL4 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of LUAD patients. Results: First, we screened 135 differentially expressed anoikis-related genes (ARGs) and 23 prognosis-related ARGs from TCGA-LUAD data set. Next, 494 LUAD samples were allocated to cluster A and cluster B based on the 23 prognosis-related ARGs. The Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis showed the overall survival (OS) of cluster B was better than that of cluster A. The clinicopathological characteristics and functional enrichment analyses revealed significant differences between clusters A and B. The tumor microenvironment (TME) analysis showed that cluster B had more immune cell infiltration and a higher TME score than cluster A. Subsequently, a LASSO Cox regression model of LUAD was constructed with ten ARGs. The K-M analysis showed that the low-risk patients had longer OS than the high-risk patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve, nomogram, and GEO data set verification results showed that the model had high accuracy and reliability. The level of immune cell infiltration and TME score were higher in the low-risk group than the high-risk group. The high-risk group had stronger sensitivity to immune checkpoint block therapy and weaker sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs than the low-risk group. ANGPTL4 expression was correlated with stage, tumor differentiation, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and OS. Conclusions: We discovered novel molecular subtypes and constructed a novel prognostic model of LUAD. Our findings provide important insights into subtype classification and the accurate survival prediction of LUAD. We also identified ANGPTL4 as a prognostic indicator of LUAD.