Comparing ultrasound-derived fat fraction and MRI-PDFF for quantifying hepatic steatosis: a real-world prospective study

被引:0
|
作者
Qi, Ruixiang [1 ]
Lu, Liren [1 ]
He, Ting [1 ]
Zhang, Liqing [2 ]
Lin, Yiting [1 ]
Bao, Lingyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Westlake Univ, Affiliated Hangzhou Peoples Hosp 1, Sch Med, Dept Ultrasound, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Westlake Univ, Affiliated Hangzhou Peoples Hosp 1, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Fatty liver; MASLD; Hepatic steatosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrasound-derived fat fraction; LIVER-DISEASE; CLASSIFICATION; GRADES;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-024-11119-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the agreement between ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) with magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) for quantification of hepatic steatosis and verify its reliability and diagnostic performance by comparing with MRI-PDFF as the reference standard. Methods: This prospective study included a primary analysis of 191 patients who underwent MRI-PDFF and UDFF from February 2023 to February 2024. MRI-PDFF were derived from three liver segment measurements with calculation of an overall median PDFF. UDFF was performed by two different sonographers for each of the six measurements, and the median was taken. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess agreement. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of UDFF in detecting different degrees of hepatic steatosis. Results: A total of 176 participants were enrolled in the final cohort of this study (median age, 36.0 years; 82 men, 94 women). The median MRI-PDFF value was 11.3% (interquartile range (IQR) 7.5-18.9); 84.7% patients had a median MRI-PDFF value >= 6.4%. The median UDFF measured by different sonographers were 9.5% (IQR: 5.0-18.0) and 9.0% (IQR: 5.0-18.0), respectively. The interobserver agreement of UDFF measurement was excellent agreement (ICC = 0.951 [95% CI: 0.934-0.964], p < 0.001). UDFF was positively strongly correlated with MRI-PDFF with ICC of 0.899 (95% CI: 0.852-0.930). The Bland-Altman analysis showed high agreement between UDFF and MRI-PDFF measurements, with a mean bias of 1.7% (95% LOA, -8.7 to 12.2%). The optimal UDFF cutoff values were 5.5%, 15.5% and 17.5% for detecting MRI-PDFF at historic thresholds of 6.4%, 17.4%, and 22.1%, with AUC of 0.851, 0.952, and 0.948, respectively. The sensitivity was 79.2%, 87.5%, 88.9%, and specificity was 81.5%, 90.6%, 90.0%, respectively. Conclusions: UDFF is a reliable and accurate method for quantification and classification of hepatic steatosis, with strong agreement to MRI-PDFF. The UDFF cutoff values of 5.5%, 15.5%, and 17.5% provide high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of mild, moderate, and severe hepatic steatosis, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:2580 / 2588
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction for Hepatic Steatosis Assessment: Prospective Study of Agreement With MRI PDFF and Sources of Variability in a Heterogeneous Population
    Kubale, Reinhard
    Schneider, Guenther
    Lessenich, Carl P. N.
    Buecker, Arno
    Wassenberg, Sebastian
    Torres, Gabriela
    Gurung, Arati
    Hall, Timothy
    Labyed, Yassin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 222 (06) : e2330775
  • [2] Reproducibility of ultrasound-derived fat fraction in measuring hepatic steatosis
    Song, Danlei
    Wang, Pingping
    Han, Jiahao
    Chen, Huihui
    Gao, Ruixia
    Li, Ling
    Li, Jia
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [3] Ultrasound-derived fat fraction for detection of hepatic steatosis and quantification of liver fat content
    Riccardo De Robertis
    Flavio Spoto
    Daniele Autelitano
    Daniela Guagenti
    Antonia Olivieri
    Piero Zanutto
    Greta Incarbone
    Mirko D’Onofrio
    La radiologia medica, 2023, 128 : 1174 - 1180
  • [4] Ultrasound-derived fat fraction for detection of hepatic steatosis and quantification of liver fat content
    De Robertis, Riccardo
    Spoto, Flavio
    Autelitano, Daniele
    Guagenti, Daniela
    Olivieri, Antonia
    Zanutto, Piero
    Incarbone, Greta
    D'Onofrio, Mirko
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2023, 128 (10): : 1174 - 1180
  • [5] Noninvasive Quantification of Hepatic Steatosis Using Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction (CHESS2303): A Prospective Multicenter Study
    Huang, Yunlin
    Li, Jia
    Liu, Chuan
    Song, Danlei
    Zhu, Chuanlong
    Ren, Yongfeng
    Lv, Jiaojian
    Jiang, Longfeng
    Shan, Rong
    Wang, Hao
    Wang, Zhou
    Long, Siqin
    Jiang, Fan
    Xie, Xiang
    Lu, Liren
    Qi, Ruixiang
    Rong, Pengfei
    Shao, Chuxiao
    Yao, Wang
    Gao, Youfang
    Wang, Wenping
    Cheng, Juan
    Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun
    Wang, Ying
    Seto, Wai-Kay
    Dong, Yi
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Qi, Xiaolong
    MEDCOMM, 2025, 6 (03):
  • [6] Hepatic steatosis using ultrasound-derived fat fraction: First technical and clinical evaluation
    Huang, Yun-Lin
    Cheng, Juan
    Wang, Ying
    Xu, Xin-Liang
    Wang, Shi-Wen
    Wei, Li
    Dong, Yi
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2024, 86 (1-2) : 51 - 61
  • [7] Hepatic fat loss in cirrhosis: Evaluation of malnutrition using MRI proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)
    Nakamura, Atsushi
    Ichikawa, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 75 : S335 - S336
  • [8] Real-time ultrasound-derived fat fraction in pediatric population: feasibility validation with MR-PDFF
    Max Zalcman
    Richard A. Barth
    Erika Rubesova
    Pediatric Radiology, 2023, 53 : 2466 - 2475
  • [9] Real-time ultrasound-derived fat fraction in pediatric population: feasibility validation with MR-PDFF
    Zalcman, Max
    Barth, Richard A.
    Rubesova, Erika
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 53 (12) : 2466 - 2475
  • [10] Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and liver biopsy to assess hepatic steatosis in obesity
    Wibulpolprasert, Pornphan
    Subpinyo, Benya
    Chirnaksorn, Supphamat
    Shantavasinkul, Prapimporn Chattranukulchai
    Putadechakum, Supanee
    Phongkitkarun, Sith
    Sritara, Chanika
    Angkathunyakul, Napat
    Sumritpradit, Preeda
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)