Study on cementitious grout for scour protection of offshore wind turbine foundations

被引:1
作者
Sha, Fei [1 ]
Gu, Shijiu [1 ]
Xu, Jingze [1 ]
Dong, Yulong [1 ]
Xia, Chenyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Engn Coll, Qingdao, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cementitious grout; sodium silicate; polyurethane; scour resistance performance; marine foundation engineering; SODIUM-SILICATE; POLYURETHANE; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1080/1064119X.2024.2411728
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
To study scour-resistant applicability, 6-10% mass ratio of polyurethane (PU) was added to sulphoaluminate cement (SAC) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) grouts to generate OPCPU and SACPU. Sodium silicate (SS) with slurry volume ratio of 1:1-5:1 was added to SAC and OPC grouts to generate OPCSS and SACSS. The water-cement ratio (w/c) of grout was 0.8-1.5. Fresh-state properties and mechanical properties were investigated. Hydrated minerals and microstructures were analyzed, scouring tests were conducted considering key formulations. The results indicated that SACSS and OPCSS have a shorter setting time and higher strength, which makes them suitable as scour resistance materials. At the w/c of 1.0, OPCSS with a volume ratio of 3:1 and SACPU with 6% PU were selected for scour resistance tests. It showed that maximum scour depths and sediment transports were 7.0-12.2 and 1.1-1.2% as those without reinforcing conditions. The critical shear stress on the seabed under reinforcement is similar to 103 times greater than the bed shear stress. This inhibits the occurrence of scouring. The study evaluated the applicability of cementitious reinforcement for scour resistance. This study analyzed material and mechanical properties, hydrated minerals, and microstructures, and conducted scour tests to optimize grouting material ratios for seabed scour protection, providing references for soil reinforcement and grouting protection.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, STANDARD TEST METHOD, DOI DOI 10.1520/C0078_C0078M-18
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, STANDARD TEST METHOD, P1, DOI DOI 10.1520/C1240-14.2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens)
[4]  
ASTM International, 2015, ASTM C143/C143M-20, V8th ed., DOI DOI 10.1520/C0143C0143M-20
[5]  
Chen Y. Y., 2017, Investigation into the Characteristics and Strength Simulation Test of the Complex Two-Component in Synchronous Grouting of Shield Tunneling
[6]   Failure behavior of riprap layer at bridge piers under live-bed conditions [J].
Chiew, YM ;
Lim, FH .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2000, 126 (01) :43-55
[7]   Laboratory experiments on local scour around cylinder for clay and clay-sand mixed beds [J].
Debnath, Koustuv ;
Chaudhuri, Susanta .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2010, 111 (1-4) :51-61
[8]   Nonlinear models to predict stress versus strain of early age strength of flowable ordinary Portland cement [J].
Emad, Wael ;
Salih, Ahmed ;
Kurda, Rawaz ;
Asteris, Panagiotis G. ;
Hassan, Aram .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (16) :8433-8457
[9]   Fresh and rheological behavior of nano-silica and fly ash blended self-compacting concrete [J].
Guneyisi, Erhan ;
Gesoglu, Mehmet ;
Al-Goody, Asraa ;
Ipek, Suleyman .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2015, 95 :29-44
[10]   Effect of super water absorbing polymer based anti-washout admixtures on the properties of seawater-mixed cement paste [J].
Guo, Hongda ;
Xu, Jianyu ;
Tang, Ziqing ;
Liu, Qing ;
Wang, Miaomiao ;
Liang, Rui ;
Sun, Guoxing .
MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2022, 55 (02)