Solar Geoengineering: History, Methods, Governance, Prospects

被引:4
作者
Parson, Edward A. [1 ]
Keith, David W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Emmett Inst Climate Change & Environm, Sch Law, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Geophys Sci, Climate Syst Engn Initiat, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
solar geoengineering; solar radiation modification; SRM; stratospheric aerosol injection; climate change; governance; CLIMATE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-081911
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Solar geoengineering, also called sunlight reflection or solar radiation modification (SRM), is a potential climate response that would cool the Earth's surface and reduce many other climate changes by scattering on order 1% of incoming sunlight back to space. SRM can only imperfectly correct for elevated greenhouse gases, but it might complement other climate responses to reduce risks, while also bringing new risks and new challenges to global governance. As climate alarm and calls for effective near-term action mount, SRM is attracting sharply increased attention and controversy, with many calls for expanded research and governance consultations along with ongoing concerns about risks, misuse, or overreliance. We review SRM's history, methods, potential uses and impacts, and governance needs, prioritizing the approach that is most prominent and promising, stratospheric aerosol injection. We identify several policy-relevant characteristics of SRM interventions and identify four narratives that capture current arguments over how SRM might be developed or used in sociopolitical context to either beneficial or destructive effect, with implications for near-term research, assessment, and governance activity.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 366
页数:30
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]   Marine cloud brightening - as effective without clouds [J].
Ahlm, Lars ;
Jones, Andy ;
Stjern, Camilla W. ;
Muri, Helene ;
Kravitz, Ben ;
Kristjansson, Jon Egill .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2017, 17 (21) :13071-13087
[2]  
Am. Geophys. Union, 2023, Rep.
[3]   Anticipating moral hazard undermines climate mitigation in an experimental geoengineering game [J].
Andrews, Talbot M. ;
Delton, Andrew W. ;
Kline, Reuben .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 196
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1955, Fortune
[6]  
Asilomar Scientific Organizing Committee, 2010, AS C REC PRINC RES C, P1
[7]   Public perceptions and support of climate intervention technologies across the Global North and Global South [J].
Baum, Chad M. ;
Fritz, Livia ;
Low, Sean ;
Sovacool, Benjamin K. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
[8]   Between the sun and us: Expert perceptions on the innovation, policy, and deep uncertainties of space-based solar geoengineering [J].
Baum, Chad M. ;
Low, Sean ;
Sovacool, Benjamin K. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 158
[9]   OPTIMAL CLIMATE POLICY IN 3D: MITIGATION, CARBON REMOVAL, AND SOLAR GEOENGINEERING [J].
Belaia, Mariia ;
Moreno-Cruz, Juan B. ;
Keith, David W. .
CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2021, 12 (03)
[10]   Solar geoengineering: The case for an international non-use agreement [J].
Biermann, Frank ;
Oomen, Jeroen ;
Gupta, Aarti ;
Ali, Saleem H. ;
Conca, Ken ;
Hajer, Maarten A. ;
Kashwan, Prakash ;
Kotze, Louis J. ;
Leach, Melissa ;
Messner, Dirk ;
Okereke, Chukwumerije ;
Persson, Asa ;
Potocnik, Janez ;
Schlosberg, David ;
Scobie, Michelle ;
VanDeveer, Stacy D. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 13 (03)