Factors influencing labial bone resorption after implant insertion with simultaneous guided bone regeneration: retrospective cone beam computed tomography study

被引:1
作者
Ouqi, Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang, X. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Man, Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Dept Oral Implantol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, State Key Lab Oral Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Dental implant; Bone resorption; Dental abutments; Bone regeneration; Cone- beam computed tomography; ANTERIOR MAXILLA; VOLUME STABILITY; SINGLE IMPLANTS; PLACEMENT; EXTRACTION; IMMEDIATE; MEMBRANES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2024.10.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This retrospective study examined factors influencing labial bone resorption in the anterior maxilla 6 months after implant insertion with simultaneous guided bone regeneration. Involving 79 patients (118 implants), the study measured labial horizontal bone width and vertical dimensions using cone beam computed tomography scans taken immediately after surgery and at 6 months. A generalized linear mixed model analyzed potential influencing factors: age, sex, implant site, timing of placement, buccal bone width at the implant platform level post-surgery, implant connection, and bone defect morphology. Significant bone resorption was noted at 6 months. The statistical analysis revealed that buccal bone width at the implant platform, implant connection, and bone defect morphology significantly impacted labial bone resorption, while patient age, sex, timing of placement, and implant site did not. Implants with a buccal bone width >= 2 mm showed significantly less labial horizontal and vertical bone resorption (horizontal P < 0.001, vertical P = 0.001), and healing abutments reduced resorption compared to cover screws (horizontal P = 0.002, vertical P = 0.034). More significant vertical resorption occurred in non-contained bone defects after guided bone regeneration (P = 0.040).
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 289
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets
    Araujo, Mauricio G.
    Sukekava, Flavia
    Wennstroem, Jan L.
    Lindhe, Jan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (06) : 615 - 624
  • [2] Horizontal guided bone regeneration on knife-edge ridges: A retrospective case-control pilot study comparing two surgical techniques
    Arnal, Helene M.
    Angioni, Charles D.
    Gaultier, Frederick
    Urbinelli, Renaud
    Urban, Istvan A.
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (02) : 211 - 221
  • [3] Immediate and early implant placement in single-tooth gaps in the anterior maxilla: A prospective study on ridge dimensional, clinical, and aesthetic changes
    Arora, Himanshu
    Ivanovski, Saso
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (11) : 1143 - 1154
  • [4] The Stability of Augmented Bone Between Two Different Membranes Used for Guided Bone Regeneration Simultaneous with Dental Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone
    Arunjaroensuk, Sirida
    Panmekiate, Soontra
    Pimkhaokham, Atiphan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (01) : 206 - 216
  • [5] Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with soft-type block versus particulate bone substitutes: Six-month results of hard-tissue changes
    Benic, Goran, I
    Bienz, Stefan P.
    Song, Young Woo
    Cha, Jae-Kook
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Jung, Ui-Won
    Jung, Ronald E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2022, 49 (05) : 480 - 495
  • [6] Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration
    Benic, Goran I.
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    [J]. PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2014, 66 (01) : 13 - 40
  • [7] Buser D, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P43
  • [8] Buser D, 2009, J PERIODONTOL, V80, P152, DOI [10.1902/jop.2009.080360, 10.1902/jop.2009.080360 ]
  • [9] Implant-Buccal Plate Distance as Diagnostic Parameter: A Prospective Cohort Study on Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Sockets
    Capelli, Matteo
    Testori, Tiziano
    Galli, Fabio
    Zuffetti, Francesco
    Motroni, Alessandro
    Weinstein, Roberto
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2013, 84 (12) : 1768 - 1774
  • [10] Effectiveness of Contour Augmentation with Guided Bone Regeneration: 10-Year Results
    Chappuis, V.
    Rahman, L.
    Buser, R.
    Janner, S. F. M.
    Belser, U. C.
    Buser, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 97 (03) : 266 - 274