Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Oocyte Donation

被引:0
作者
Chalova, Leila [1 ,2 ]
Lokshin, Vyacheslav [3 ]
Kiyan, Vladimir [4 ]
Turdaliyeva, Botagoz [4 ]
Zhybanisheva, Karlygash [2 ]
Kinzhibayev, Arman [1 ]
机构
[1] LLP M1 Hlth & Sci Ctr, Astana 010011, Kazakhstan
[2] Kazakhstan Med Univ, Higher Sch Publ Hlth, Alma Ata, Kazakhstan
[3] ICCR Persona, Alma Ata 050060, Kazakhstan
[4] Natl Ctr Biotechnol, Astana 090000, Kazakhstan
关键词
Gamete donation; Donation motives; Donor rights; Oocyte donors; Assisted reproductive technologies; ATTITUDES; CHILDREN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: A number of important problems remain unresolved in the field of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) using germ cells from a single donor. We aimed to assess attitudes about the use of sex gamete donation in ART in different social groups including medical workers, oocyte recipients, and oocyte donors. Methods: To achieve this goal, we surveyed 286 participants from seven countries. Of them, 190 were medical workers from ART clinics (respondents from seven countries), 45 were oocyte recipients, and 51 were oocyte donors. Results: The main motive for oocyte donation was financial compensation, which draws attention to the social disadvantage of the donor population. Medical workers with more than 5 years of work experience (79.7%) supported the use of programs tracking donor sex cells and limiting the use of oocyte donors. Conclusion: The willingness and consent of the surveyed medical workers and oocyte recipients to use the donor material and create a unified registry of donor sex cells demonstrates the importance of this issue.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 614
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Money, morals and medical risks: conflicting notions underlying the recruitment of egg donors
    Ahuja, KK
    Simons, EG
    Edwards, RG
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (02) : 279 - 283
  • [2] Aylamazyan EK, 2007, Prenatal di-agnostics of hereditary and congenital diseases
  • [3] Commercial Surrogacy: An Overview
    Brandao, Pedro
    Garrido, Nicolas
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2022, 44 (12): : 1141 - 1158
  • [4] Swedish normative data on personality using the temperament and character inventory
    Brandstrom, S
    Schlette, P
    Przybeck, TR
    Lundberg, M
    Forsgren, T
    Sigvardsson, S
    Nylander, PO
    Nilsson, LG
    Cloninger, RC
    Adolfsson, R
    [J]. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 39 (03) : 122 - 128
  • [5] Chalova LR, 2020, Reproductive Medicine, V2, P7
  • [6] Healthcare Ministry of the Republic of Kazakh-stan, 2020, Order of December 15, 2020 No. KR DCM-272/2020
  • [7] Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences
    Jordan, CB
    Belar, CD
    Williams, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 25 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [8] Viability Assessment for Artificial Gametes: The Need for Biomarkers of Functional Competency
    Kashir, Junaid
    Jones, Celine
    Child, Tim
    Williams, Suzannah A.
    Coward, Kevin
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2012, 87 (05)
  • [9] Kononova Sardana K, 2014, Int J Circumpolar Health, V73, P25062, DOI 10.3402/ijch.v73.25062
  • [10] Advances in Medically-assisted procreation technologies: can malpractice claims and "reproductive damage" be identified?
    Negro, F.
    Varone, M. C.
    Del Rio, A.
    [J]. CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, 2020, 171 (03): : E225 - E228