A Quantum Probability Approach to Improving Human-AI Decision Making

被引:0
作者
Humr, Scott [1 ]
Canan, Mustafa [1 ]
Demir, Mustafa [2 ]
机构
[1] Naval Postgrad Sch, Dept Informat Sci, Monterey, CA 93943 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Appl Cognit Ergon Lab, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; decision making; quantum decision theory; human-in-the-loop; generative AI; AUTOMATION; LEADERSHIP; COGNITION; TRUST;
D O I
10.3390/e27020152
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence is set to incorporate additional decision space that has traditionally been the purview of humans. However, AI systems that support decision making also entail the rationalization of AI outputs by humans. Yet, incongruencies between AI and human rationalization processes may introduce uncertainties in human decision making, which require new conceptualizations to improve the predictability of these interactions. The application of quantum probability theory (QPT) to human cognition is on the ascent and warrants potential consideration to human-AI decision making to improve these outcomes. This perspective paper explores how QPT may be applied to human-AI interactions and contributes by integrating these concepts into human-in-the-loop decision making. To capture this and offer a more comprehensive conceptualization, we use human-in-the-loop constructs to explicate how recent applications of QPT can ameliorate the models of interaction by providing a novel way to capture these behaviors. Followed by a summary of the challenges posed by human-in-the-loop systems, we discuss newer theories that advance models of the cognitive system by using quantum probability formalisms. We conclude by outlining areas of promising future research in human-AI decision making in which the proposed methods may apply.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]   Analyzing Operator States and the Impact of AI-Enhanced Decision Support in Control Rooms: A Human-in-the-Loop Specialized Reinforcement Learning Framework for Intervention Strategies [J].
Abbas, Ammar N. ;
Amazu, Chidera W. ;
Mietkiewicz, Joseph ;
Briwa, Houda ;
Perez, Andres Alonso ;
Baldissone, Gabriele ;
Demichela, Micaela ;
Chasparis, Georgios C. ;
Kelleher, John D. ;
Leva, Maria Chiara .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2024,
[2]   Quantum structure in cognition [J].
Aerts, Diederik .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 53 (05) :314-348
[3]  
Agrawal P.M., 2010, Quantum Mechanics and Human Decision Making, P1653911, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.1653911, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1653911]
[4]  
Aiken M., 2017, The Cyber Effect: An Expert in Cyberpsychology Explains How Technology Is Shaping Our Children, Our Behavior, and Our Values--and What We Can Do About It, V1st
[5]   In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence [J].
Araujo, Theo ;
Helberger, Natali ;
Kruikemeier, Sanne ;
de Vreese, Claes H. .
AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 (03) :611-623
[6]  
Arnold Vicky, 2004, Account. Financ, V44, P1, DOI [10.1111/j.1467-629x.2004.00099.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-629X.2004.00099.X]
[7]   A formulation of computational trust based on quantum decision theory [J].
Ashtiani, Mehrdad ;
Azgomi, Mohammad Abdollahi .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2016, 18 (04) :735-764
[8]   Algorithmic decision-making? The user interface and its role for human involvement in decisions supported by artificial intelligence [J].
Bader, Verena ;
Kaiser, Stephan .
ORGANIZATION, 2019, 26 (05) :655-672
[9]   Should Artificial Intelligence be used to support clinical ethical decision-making? A systematic review of reasons [J].
Benzinger, Lasse ;
Ursin, Frank ;
Balke, Wolf-Tilo ;
Kacprowski, Tim ;
Salloch, Sabine .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 24 (01)
[10]  
Bisantz A., 2000, Empirical Investigations of Trust-Related Systems Vulnerabilities in Aided, Adversarial Decision Making