Digital 3D tomosynthesis in the diagnosis and screening of breast cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Tasnadi, Tunde [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Oliva Med Maganklinika, Bekescsaba, Hungary
[2] Dr Rethy Pal Tagkorhaz, Radiol Osztaly, Bekes Varmegye Kozpont Korhaz, Bekescsaba, Hungary
关键词
breast cancer; digital breast tomosynthesis; ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTION; MAMMOGRAPHY FFDM; 2-VIEW; 2D-MAMMOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; OUTCOMES; PROGRAM; TRIALS; EXTENT; RATES;
D O I
10.1556/650.2024.33113
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Breast cancer mortality and morbidity are significantly reduced with the introduction of the mammography screening program. From the point of view of complete recovery, there is an extremely high demand for early detection. Digital 3D tomosynthesis is a complementary modality to digital mammography (full-field digital mammography - FFDM), which has been accepted by the FDA since 2011, and is well suited for the diagnosis of breast diseases and breast screening. Basic principle of digital 3D tomosynthesis: during the examination, an x-ray tube moving in a given circular arc takes 10-15 overlapping digital images of the breast - with a small dose of radiation - in a short time. From the data set obtained in this way, thin-slice layer images (3D tomosynthesis) and reconstructed, so-called synthetic 2D images - similar to the traditional mammographic image - are also produced. In addition to the advantages (higher cancer detection rate, more accurate assessment of abnormal patterns, structural distortion, asymmetric density, reduction of the number of unnecessary biopsy, decreasing recall rate in screening), knowing the dilemmas related to the disadvantages ( e.g., radiation exposure, need for larger storage space) is also important.
引用
收藏
页码:1443 / 1451
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital breast tomosynthesis in diagnosis and screening of breast cancer: A systematic review
    Xu, Lu
    Zeng, Baoqi
    Zhan, Siyan
    Sun, Feng
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 343 - 344
  • [2] Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Skaane, Per
    BREAST CANCER, 2017, 24 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [3] Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Per Skaane
    Breast Cancer, 2017, 24 : 32 - 41
  • [4] Analysis of the utility of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis
    Kikuyama, M.
    Kato, M.
    Kaisaki, S.
    Yao, Y.
    Sakatani, T.
    BREAST, 2019, 44 : S51 - S52
  • [5] Clinical Performance Metrics of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With 2D Digital Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Community Practice
    Greenberg, Julianne S.
    Javitt, Marcia C.
    Katzen, Jason
    Michael, Sara
    Holland, Agnes E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (03) : 687 - 693
  • [6] Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for breast cancer screening and for assessment of screen-recalled findings: review of the evidence
    Li, Tong
    Marinovich, Michael Luke
    Houssami, Nehmat
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2018, 18 (08) : 785 - 791
  • [7] BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS OR DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY FOR BREAST CANCER SCREENING?
    Svahn, Tony
    MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE BALTIC STATES, 2011, : 53 - 56
  • [8] Simulation of 3D DLA masses in digital breast tomosynthesis
    Rashidnasab, Alaleh
    Elangovan, Premkumar
    Diaz, Oliver
    Mackenzie, Alistair
    Young, Kenneth
    Dance, David
    Wells, Kevin
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 8668
  • [9] Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Bernardi, Daniela
    Caumo, Francesca
    Pellegrini, Marco
    Brunelli, Silvia
    Tuttobene, Paola
    Bricolo, Paola
    Fanto, Carmine
    Valentini, Marvi
    Montemezzi, Stefania
    Macaskill, Petra
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07): : 583 - 589
  • [10] Efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer diagnosis
    Alakhras, M.
    Mello-Thoms, C.
    Rickard, M.
    Bourne, R.
    Brennan, P. C.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2014, 9037