Institutionalising formative assessment through school reform: when educational policy and teacher education are misaligned

被引:1
作者
Pastore, Serafina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bari, Dept Res & Humanities Innovat, Bari, Italy
关键词
Formative assessment; initial teacher education; assessment education; teacher assessment literacy; course syllabus; ASSESSMENT LITERACY; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; CLASSROOM; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/2331186X.2024.2428075
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The interest in formative assessment, which is highly valued in current conceptualisations of teacher assessment literacy, has led to a renewed focus on initial teacher education (ITE) programmes, as well as on the assessment education domain. The conceptual understanding of the theory and practice of formative assessment has been long advocated by scholars. However, most of the research conducted over the years has primarily focused on the effectiveness of pre-service courses in promoting teacher assessment literacy, while the assessment content and pedagogies provided to teacher students have received limited attention. Given the emphasis on formative assessment, recently introduced as a compulsory practice in the Italian school system, this study offers a first scan of educational assessment courses provided by the national (ITE) programmes. Using nationwide data from 74 syllabi of educational assessment courses, a content analysis has been performed to detect if, and to what extent, ITE programmes have been revised to reflect the new formative assessment demands. More specifically, the analysis determined the existence and frequency of formative assessment content. Findings indicate a limited presence of formative assessment (theory and practice) elements across the selected syllabi. Implications and future directions for educational practice, research, and policy are finally discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Allal L., 2020, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy Practice, V27, P332, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411
[2]  
Allen M.J., 2004, ASSESSING ACAD PROGR
[3]   Leading an Assessment Reform: Ensuring a Whole-School Approach for Decision-Making [J].
Alonzo, Dennis ;
Leverett, Jade ;
Obsioma, Elisha .
FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2021, 6
[4]  
Andrade H.L., 2018, Using formative assessment to enhance learning, achievement, and academic self-regulation
[5]   Pre-service teachers as learners of formative assessment in teaching practice [J].
Atjonen, Paivi ;
Kontkanen, Sini ;
Ruotsalainen, Paivi ;
Pontinen, Susanna .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2024, 47 (02) :267-284
[6]  
Black P., 1998, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy Practice, V5, P7, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102
[7]   Classroom assessment and pedagogy [J].
Black, Paul ;
Wiliam, Dylan .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2018, 25 (06) :551-575
[8]   Teacher change and "high-stakes" assessment: what happens to professional developrnent? [J].
Boardman, AG ;
Woodruff, AL .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2004, 20 (06) :545-557
[9]   The effect of a formative assessment practice on student achievement in mathematics [J].
Bostrom, Erika ;
Palm, Torulf .
FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
[10]   Educational Assessment Knowledge and Skills for Teachers Revisited [J].
Brookhart, Susan M. .
EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (07)