Patient Preferences for Provider Specialization for Induced Abortion and Miscarriage Care

被引:0
作者
Judge-Golden, Colleen [1 ]
Sheffield, Sydney [2 ]
Hernandez, Lucero [2 ]
Davis, Norma [1 ]
Fairchild, Rebecca [2 ]
Swartz, Jonas J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Womens Community & Populat Hlth, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Margolis Inst Hlth Policy, Durham, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
abortion; miscarriage; patient preferences; complex family planning; general OB/GYN; WOMENS KNOWLEDGE; UNITED-STATES; RESTRICTIONS; EXPERIENCES; PROVISION; ATTITUDES; STIGMA; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1089/jwh.2024.0884
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: Most induced abortions are provided by abortion specialists, despite knowledge and skills overlap with other disciplines, particularly general obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN). We evaluated patient preferences for abortion and miscarriage care from a family planning specialist versus other providers, and perceptions of a general OB/GYN's ability to provide safe miscarriage and abortion care. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among individuals aged 18-44 receiving induced abortion (n = 54) or nonabortion gynecological care (n = 111) in North Carolina hospital-based gynecology or family planning clinics between April and October 2023. The primary predictor was appointment type. The primary outcome was preference for induced abortion from a family planning specialist versus other providers; secondary outcomes were provider specialty preference for miscarriage care and patient perceptions of a general OB/GYN's scope of practice. We evaluated associations between appointment type, outcomes, and participant characteristics. Results: This was a racially diverse population with half (50.3%) using public health insurance. Most (73.0%) felt abortion is "morally acceptable and should be legal." Over half (53.1%) preferred induced abortion from a specialist provider, compared with one-third (32.7%) for miscarriage (p < 0.001), with no differences by appointment type. Educational attainment (p = 0.03) and Democratic party affiliation (p = 0.02) were independently associated with abortion specialist preference, but not significant in multivariable analysis. More participants believed a general OB/GYN can provide medications for miscarriage management compared with induced abortion (94.5% versus 86.6%, p = 0.01). Both medical and surgical first trimester induced abortions were more often identified as within-scope for a general OB/GYN than the ability to perform a hysterectomy (69.8%, p < 0.01). Most (78.8%) believed OB/GYNs should be required to train in abortion care. Conclusions: Participants were more likely to prefer a family planning specialist for induced abortion care versus miscarriage; however, nearly half preferred nonspecialist care. Incorporation of induced abortion into general practice settings may meet patient preferences while expanding access.
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 703
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Obstet Gynecol, V124, P1055, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000456327.96480.18
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Targeted regulation of abortion providers
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SAFETY QUALITY ABORT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, The ANES Guide to Public Opinion and Electoral Behavior
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
[6]   Defying the odds: Facilitating integration of abortion care into clinical practice in the United States☆,☆☆ [J].
Bayat, Lily ;
Biefeld, Sharla ;
Sussman, Andrew L. ;
Hofler, Lisa ;
Pereda, Brenda ;
Espey, Eve .
CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 138
[7]   Interprofessional Abortion Opposition: A National Survey and Qualitative Interviews with Abortion Training Program Directors at US Teaching Hospitals [J].
Bennett, Ariana H. ;
Freedman, Lori ;
Landy, Uta ;
Langton, Callie ;
Ly, Elizabeth ;
Rocca, Corinne H. .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2020, 52 (04) :235-244
[8]   Public perceptions of abortion complications [J].
Chaiken, Sarina R. ;
Darney, Blair G. ;
Schenck, Marta ;
Han, Leo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 229 (04)
[9]   Factors Shaping Women's Pre-abortion Communication with Their Regular Gynecologic Care Providers [J].
Chor, Julie ;
Tusken, Megan ;
Lyman, Phoebe ;
Gilliam, Melissa .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2016, 26 (04) :437-441
[10]   Estimating abortion provision and abortion referrals among United States obstetrician-gynecologists in private practice [J].
Desai, Sheila ;
Jones, Rachel K. ;
Castle, Kate .
CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 97 (04) :297-302