Intraday liquidity risk: based on microprudential and macroprudential regulatory perspective

被引:0
作者
Yan, Yutong [1 ,2 ]
Tong, Mu [1 ,3 ]
He, Yi [4 ]
Miao, Yuying [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Chinese Financial Studies, 555 Liutai Ave, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Financial Secur, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Int Business, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Risk management; macroprudential regulation; Large-value payment system (LVPS); Real-time gross settlement (RTGS); liquidity risk; G21; G28; C15; POLICIES; PAYMENT;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2024.2405199
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the effectiveness of current regulations on intraday liquidity risk through a comprehensive analysis using network structure and payment flow characteristics of China's large-value payment system. Utilizing simulation and econometric methods, it examines the factors influencing the upper limit of liquidity levels required by payment system participants to satisfy real-time gross settlement (RTGS) and its tail distribution. The results of the study show that: (1) in a network topology, the characteristics of a node significantly affect its demand for intraday liquidity and its exposure to intraday liquidity risk; (2) microprudential regulation based only on individuals not only fails to achieve macroprudential regulatory objectives, but also fails to realize individual microprudential regulatory objectives, and at the same time, it reduces the efficiency of liquidity use; (3) reallocating intraday liquidity among participants based on systemic effects not only saves liquidity overall, but also achieves the macroprudential regulatory objective of liquidity at a high probability level. This study provides valuable theoretical and practical insights for regulators and financial managers, emphasizing the importance of effective regulation to prevent the evolution of intraday liquidity risk into systemic risk.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [41] Tools for managing financial-stability risks from capital inflows
    Ostry, Jonathan D.
    Ghosh, Atish R.
    Chamon, Marcos
    Qureshi, Mahvash S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 88 (02) : 407 - 421
  • [42] Ramlall I., 2018, Economic Areas Under Financial Stability The Theory and Practice of Financial Stability, V4, P27, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-841-920181002, DOI 10.1108/978-1-78756-841-920181002]
  • [43] Strategic Liquidity Mismatch and Financial Sector Stability
    Silva, Andre F.
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2019, 32 (12) : 4696 - 4733
  • [44] SinkRank: An Algorithm for Identifying Systemically Important Banks in Payment Systems
    Soramaki, Kimmo
    Cook, Samantha
    [J]. ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL, 2013, 7 : 1 - 28
  • [45] Sui C., 2016, CHINESE MANAGEMENT S, V24, P54
  • [46] Tong M., 2013, Journal of Systems Management, V22, P619, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1005-2542.2013.05.004, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1005-2542.2013.05.004]
  • [47] Tong M., 2012, Journal of Financial Research, P20
  • [48] Tong M., 2017, Finance: Theory and Practice, V8, P94, DOI [https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-4625.2017.08.017, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1003-4625.2017.08.017]
  • [49] Zhou X. C., 2011, Journal of Financial Research, P1