Intraday liquidity risk: based on microprudential and macroprudential regulatory perspective

被引:0
作者
Yan, Yutong [1 ,2 ]
Tong, Mu [1 ,3 ]
He, Yi [4 ]
Miao, Yuying [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Chinese Financial Studies, 555 Liutai Ave, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Financial Secur, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Int Business, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Risk management; macroprudential regulation; Large-value payment system (LVPS); Real-time gross settlement (RTGS); liquidity risk; G21; G28; C15; POLICIES; PAYMENT;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2024.2405199
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the effectiveness of current regulations on intraday liquidity risk through a comprehensive analysis using network structure and payment flow characteristics of China's large-value payment system. Utilizing simulation and econometric methods, it examines the factors influencing the upper limit of liquidity levels required by payment system participants to satisfy real-time gross settlement (RTGS) and its tail distribution. The results of the study show that: (1) in a network topology, the characteristics of a node significantly affect its demand for intraday liquidity and its exposure to intraday liquidity risk; (2) microprudential regulation based only on individuals not only fails to achieve macroprudential regulatory objectives, but also fails to realize individual microprudential regulatory objectives, and at the same time, it reduces the efficiency of liquidity use; (3) reallocating intraday liquidity among participants based on systemic effects not only saves liquidity overall, but also achieves the macroprudential regulatory objective of liquidity at a high probability level. This study provides valuable theoretical and practical insights for regulators and financial managers, emphasizing the importance of effective regulation to prevent the evolution of intraday liquidity risk into systemic risk.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Len C., 2016, Journal of Financial Stability, VS1572308916301310, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2448722, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2448722]
  • [32] Lu J., 2014, China Soft Science Magazine, V4, P25, DOI [https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2014.04.004, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1002-9753.2014.04.004]
  • [33] Liquidity risk and policy options
    Maddaloni, Giuseppe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2015, 50 : 514 - 527
  • [34] Manning M. J., 2009, The Economics of Large-Value Payments and Settlement: Theory and Policy Issues for Central Banks, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199571116.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780199571116.001.0001]
  • [35] Mattayaphutron S., 2022, The Asian Bulletin of Contemporary Issues in Economics and Finance, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.62019/ABCIEF.V2I2.26
  • [36] McLafferty J, 2013, SIMULATION IN COMPUTATIONAL FINANCE AND ECONOMICS: TOOLS AND EMERGING APPLICATIONS, P120, DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-2011-7.ch007
  • [37] Risk and concentration in payment and securities settlement systems
    Mills, David C., Jr.
    Nesmith, Travis D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2008, 55 (03) : 542 - 553
  • [38] [牛晨 NIU Chen], 2008, [系统工程, Systems Engineering], V26, P23
  • [39] Norman B, 2010, J. Payments Strategy Systems, V4, P261
  • [40] Norman B., 2011, Bank of England Working Paper No. 412