Alternative Effects Yeast-Based Biostimulants Against Downy Mildew in Vitis vinifera cv Cabernet Sauvignon

被引:0
作者
Puccioni, Sergio [1 ]
Biselli, Chiara [2 ]
Perria, Rita [1 ]
Zanella, Gianmaria [3 ]
D'Arcangelo, Mauro Eugenio Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] CREA VE, Res Ctr Viticulture & Enol, Consiglio Ric Agr & Anal Econ Agr, Viale Santa Margher 80, I-52100 Arezzo, Italy
[2] CREA FL, Res Ctr Forestry & Wood, Consiglio Ric Agr & Anal Econ Agr, Viale Santa Margher 80, I-52100 Arezzo, Italy
[3] Enolog Vason, Via Nassar 37, I-37029 San Pietro A Cariano, Verona, Italy
关键词
grapevine; <italic>Plasmopara viticola</italic>; yeast-based biostimulants; caftaric and cumaric acids; flavonoids; stilbenes; bioproducts; PHENOLIC-COMPOUNDS; ANTIOXIDANT; RESISTANCE; PLANTS; BIOSYNTHESIS; ELICITORS; LEAVES;
D O I
10.3390/horticulturae11020203
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Grapevine downy mildew, caused by Plasmopara viticola, is one of the most destructive vineyard diseases worldwide, with the potential to devastate up to 90% of harvests under adverse conditions. Traditional chemical-based control strategies are increasingly restricted due to environmental concerns and the development of resistant pathogen strains, prompting the search for sustainable alternatives. This study evaluated the efficacy of two yeast-based biostimulants (YE1, an experimental formulation, and YE2, Romeo, a commercial preparation containing Cerevisane (R)) in mitigating P. viticola infections in Vitis vinifera cv Cabernet Sauvignon under open field conditions. Field trials were designed to monitor the effects of these bioproducts on grapevine metabolism, with a focus on the biosynthesis of phenolic compounds linked to plant defense responses. Both biostimulants demonstrated significant efficacy against downy mildew, achieving protection levels above 93% during critical growth stages. Metabolic analyses of leaves revealed distinct impacts of YE1 and YE2 on secondary metabolite dynamics. YE1 primarily promoted the accumulation of flavonols, such as quercetin glycosides and kaempferol glucosides, which are known to contribute to pathogen resistance through antimicrobial activity and ROS detoxification. Compared to the untreated sample, quercetin glycosides levels in YE1 leaves were approximately 700 mu g/g higher (+9.6%), in comparison to control conditions, on a dry weight basis after the first treatment in 2019 and about 900 mu g/g higher (+13.7%) after the final treatment in 2020. A similar trend was observed for kaempferol concentrations, which were 70 mu g/g (+98.7%) and 100 mu g/g higher (+24.6%) on the same dates. In contrast, YE2 enhanced the biosynthesis of caftaric and coutaric acids, known for their antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. These compounds were induced by YE2 over time and, after the last treatment, in 2019 caftaric acid levels were approximately 345 mu g/g higher (+25.9%), than control condition, while coutaric acid levels were 30 mu g/g higher (+33.8%). The stilbene piceid was also induced at early stages by treatments, indicating its role in enhancing plant defenses. In 2019, after the first treatment, both YE1 and YE2 applications induced an increase in piceid concentration, compared to the control, of approximately 2.5 mu g/g (+104.8%) for YE1 and 1.3 mu g/g for Y2 (+55.0%). In contrast, in 2020, the effect was more pronounced for YE2, with concentrations exceeding the control by 2 mu g/g (+46.2%). The results suggest that these yeast-based bioproducts act as elicitors, effectively enhancing grapevine immunity and reducing reliance on synthetic inputs. This study provides novel insights into the metabolic mechanisms underlying the efficacy of yeast-based biostimulants against downy mildew and offers practical guidance for their strategic application.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Toffolatti S.L., Russo G., Campia P., Bianco P.A., Borsa P., Coatti M., Torriani S.F., Sierotzki H., A time-course investigation of resistance to the carboxylic acid amide mandipropamid in field populations of Plasmopara viticola treated with anti-resistance strategies, Pest Manag. Sci, 74, pp. 2822-2834, (2018)
  • [2] Reglinski T., Lyon G.D., Newton A.C., Induction of resistance mechanisms in barley by yeast-derived elicitors, Ann. Appl. Biol, 124, pp. 509-517, (1994)
  • [3] Bahuguna A., Sharma S., Rai A., Bhardwaj R., Sahoo S.K., Pandey A., Yadav B., Advance technology for biostimulants in agriculture, New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 17, pp. 393-412, (2022)
  • [4] Koledenkova K., Esmaeel Q., Jacquard C., Nowak J., Clement C., Ait Barka E., Plasmopara viticola the Causal Agent of Downy Mildew of Grapevine: From Its Taxonomy to Disease Management, Front. Microbiol, 13, (2022)
  • [5] Ricci M., Tilbury L., Daridon B., Sukalac K., General Principles to Justify Plant Biostimulant Claims, Front. Plant Sci, 10, (2019)
  • [6] Hamid B., Zaman M., Farooq S., Fatima S., Sayyed R.Z., Baba Z.A., Sheikh T.A., Reddy M.S., El Enshasy H., Gafur A., Et al., Bacterial Plant Biostimulants: A Sustainable Way towards Improving Growth
  • [7] Productivity
  • [8] and Health of Crops, Sustainability, 13, (2021)
  • [9] Cataldo E., Fucile M., Mattii G.B., Biostimulants in Viticulture: A Sustainable Approach against Biotic and Abiotic Stresses, Plants, 11, (2022)
  • [10] Jindo K., Goron T.L., Pizarro-Tobias P., Sanchez-Monedero M.A., Audette Y., Deolu-Ajayi A.O., van der Werf A., Goitom Teklu M., Shenker M., Pombo Sudre C., Et al., Application of biostimulant products and biological control agents in sustainable viticulture: A review, Front. Plant Sci, 13, (2022)