Improved Glycemic Control in Insulin-Treated Individuals With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Through Combined Structured Education With Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring

被引:0
作者
Yoo, Jee Hee [1 ,2 ]
Jun, Ji Eun [3 ]
Kwak, Soo Heon [4 ]
Kim, Jae Hyeon [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab,Gwangmyeong Hosp, Gwangmyeong, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Wonju Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab, Wonju, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Dept Internal Med,Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab,Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[5] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab,Sch Med, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[6] Samsung Adv Inst Hlth Sci & Technol, Dept Clin Res Design & Evaluat, Seoul, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2025年
关键词
education; glycated hemoglobin; insulin; older adults; real-time continuous glucose monitoring; type; 2; diabetes; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1177/19322968241306136
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: We evaluated the efficacy of structured individualized education combined with real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM, Dexcom G6) in improving glycemic outcomes in insulin-treated adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: This multicenter, 16-week, single-arm study included 66 adults with T2D (multiple daily insulin [MDI]: 33; basal insulin: 33) with a >= 7.8%. Each cohort comprised 15 participants aged >= 60 years. The participants attended four educational sessions. The primary outcome was a change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels between baseline and week 16. Results: Sixty-four individuals were included in this study, with a mean age of 58.3 +/- 12.4 years. The mean HbA(1c) levels decreased from 9.0% at baseline to 7.1% at 16 weeks in the MDI group (difference: -1.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.3 to -1.3) and from 8.8% to 7.0% in the basal insulin group (difference: -1.8%, 95% CI = -2.1 to -1.4). In the total population, the mean time in range 70 to 180 mg/dL increased by 25.2% (6 hours 4 minutes, 95% CI = 20.6 to 29.8), whereas the time in tight range 70 to 140 mg/dL increased by 17.3% (4 hours 10 minutes, 95% CI = 14.0 to 20.7). Both groups maintained a target of <1% of the time below the range of <54 mg/dL. Improvements in HbA(1c) and CGM metrics were comparable between individuals aged >= 60 years and those aged <60 years (all P-values for interaction >.1). Conclusions: In adults with poorly controlled insulin-treated T2D, rt-CGM use with structured education significantly improved the HbA(1c) and CGM metrics, primarily by reducing hyperglycemia, regardless of age.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Barriers to self-management of diabetes
    Ahola, A. J.
    Groop, P. -H.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2013, 30 (04) : 413 - 420
  • [2] Aleppo G, 2021, DIABETES CARE, V44, P2729, DOI 10.2337/dc21-1304
  • [3] 6. Glycemic Goals and Hypoglycemia: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024
    不详
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2024, 47 : S111 - S125
  • [4] Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal Insulin
    Bao, Shichun
    Bailey, Ryan
    Calhoun, Peter
    Beck, Roy W.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 24 (05) : 299 - 306
  • [5] Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections A Randomized Trial
    Beck, Roy W.
    Riddlesworth, Tonya D.
    Ruedy, Katrina
    Ahmann, Andrew
    Haller, Stacie
    Kruger, Davida
    McGill, Janet B.
    Polonsky, William
    Price, David
    Aronoff, Stephen
    Aronson, Ronnie
    Toschi, Elena
    Kollman, Craig
    Bergenstal, Richard
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 167 (06) : 365 - +
  • [6] Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring provides no benefit over structured self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes not on prandial insulin, in the context of diabetes self-management education: GLucose monitoring programme SingaporE (GLiMPSE)
    Chandran, Suresh Rama
    Rahman, Nabilah
    Gandhi, Mihir
    Tan, Ngiap Chuan
    Phoon, Ian K. Y.
    Seah, Darren E. J.
    Cheah, Ming Hann
    Sek, Kathleen
    Gardner, Daphne Su -Lyn
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 211
  • [7] Committee for Patient Advocacy K, 2021, Guidance for Blood Glucose Control Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring System
  • [8] Grace T, 2024, Diabetes Technol Ther, V26, pA, DOI [10.1089/dia.2024.2525, DOI 10.1089/DIA.2024.2525]
  • [9] Diabetes Education and Support Tele-Visit Needs Differ in Duration, Content, and Satisfaction in Older Versus Younger Adults
    Greenfield, Margaret
    Stuber, Diana
    Stegman-Barber, Danielle
    Kemmis, Karen
    Matthews, Belinda
    Feuerstein-Simon, Carly B.
    Saha, Prasenjit
    Wells, Beth
    McArthur, Teresa
    Morley, Christopher P.
    Weinstock, Ruth S.
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE REPORTS, 2022, 3 (01): : 107 - 116
  • [10] The impact of a structured education and treatment programme (FLASH) for people with diabetes using a flash sensor-based glucose monitoring system: Results of a randomized controlled trial
    Hermanns, Norbert
    Ehrmann, Dominic
    Schipfer, Melanie
    Kroeger, Jens
    Haak, Thomas
    Kulzer, Bernhard
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 150 : 111 - 121