Services of general interest and critical infrastructures: interdependencies and implications for resilience and territorial cohesion

被引:0
作者
Greiving, Stefan [1 ]
Terfruechte, Thomas [2 ]
Fleischhauer, Mark [1 ]
Hartz, Andrea [3 ]
Furkert, Matthias [4 ]
机构
[1] TU Dortmund Univ, Chair Reg Dev & Risk Management & plan risk consul, Dept Spatial Planning, Dortmund, Germany
[2] TU Dortmund Univ, Chair Reg Planning & Planning Theory, Dept Spatial Planning, Dortmund, Germany
[3] agl Hartz Saad Wendl, Saarbrucken, Germany
[4] Fed Inst Res Bldg Urban Affairs & Spatial Dev BBSR, Div RS Spatial Planning Policies Spatial Impacts 8, Bonn, Germany
关键词
Resilience; central places; critical infrastructures; territorial cohesion; services of general interest;
D O I
10.1080/09654313.2025.2461790
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recent times have shown that external conditions and climatic developments require more intensive consideration of the resilience of our infrastructures. This article presents the methodology and empirical results of a German spatial planning pilot project that systematically analysed the strategic options for maintaining the functionality of Services of General Interest (SGI) and Critical Infrastructures (CI) covering all of Germany's federal states. Added value is created through a better understanding of the various infrastructures and their specific criticality and by answering how the infrastructures can be made more resilient and thus contribute to equal living conditions and territorial cohesion. The article also emphasises the connection between spatial resilience approaches and European cohesion and climate policy and makes recommendations for adaptation in European structural and funding policy. The authors recommend a systematic territorial consideration of SGI and CI to prevent negative effects on balanced and stable spatial development. To achieve this goal, interdependencies between infrastructures and cascading effects should be considered in the future. Infrastructures are usually bundled in central places. Therefore, the article also provides conceptual and practice-orientated proposals for planning strategies on which central places can be made more resilient.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 351
页数:23
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Aguiar Borges L., 2015, Services of General Interest and Territorial Cohesion, P123
[2]   Planned retreat in Global South megacities: disentangling policy, practice, and environmental justice [J].
Ajibade, Idowu .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2019, 157 (02) :299-317
[3]  
Anglmayer I., 2021, Revision of Directive 2008/114/EC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2024, Ninth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Forging a climate-resilient Europe-the new EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change
[6]  
ARL, 2022, COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons for spatial development
[7]   Resettlement as climate change adaptation: what can be learned from state-led relocation in rural Africa and Asia? [J].
Arnall, Alex .
CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 11 (03) :253-263
[8]  
Batty M., 2008, Cities as complex systems: Scaling, interactions, networks, dynamics and urban morphologies
[9]  
Bauby P., 2014, Final Overall Report. DG Regio Contract No 2003.CE.16.0.AT.038
[10]  
Bjrnsen H. M., 2015, Services of General Interest and Territorial Cohesion, P49, DOI [10.14220/9783737004718.49, DOI 10.14220/9783737004718.49]