Understanding Factors Influencing Generative AI Use Intention: A Bayesian Network-Based Probabilistic Structural Equation Model Approach

被引:0
作者
Kim, Cheong [1 ]
机构
[1] aSSIST Univ, Off Res, Seoul 03767, South Korea
来源
ELECTRONICS | 2025年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
generative AI; TAM; UTAUT; anthropomorphism; animacy; probabilistic structural equation model; EQUIVALENCE CLASSES; INFORMATION; ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.3390/electronics14030530
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study investigates the factors influencing users' intention to use generative AI by employing a Bayesian network-based probabilistic structural equation model approach. Recognizing the limitations of traditional models like the technology acceptance model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, this research incorporates novel constructs such as perceived anthropomorphism and animacy to capture the unique human-like qualities of generative AI. Data were collected from 803 participants with prior experience of using generative AI applications. The analysis reveals that social influence (standardized total effect = 0.550) is the most significant predictor of use intention, followed by effort expectancy (0.480) and perceived usefulness (0.454). Perceived anthropomorphism (0.149) and animacy (0.145) also influence use intention, but with a lower relative impact. By utilizing a probabilistic structural equation model, this study overcomes the linear limitations of traditional acceptance models, allowing for the exploration of nonlinear relationships and conditional dependencies. These findings provide actionable insights for improving generative AI design, user engagement, and adoption strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Pezzulo G., Parr T., Cisek P., Clark A., Friston K., Generating meaning: Active inference and the scope and limits of passive AI, Trends Cogn. Sci, 28, pp. 97-112, (2024)
  • [2] Sengar S.S., Hasan A.B., Kumar S., Carroll F., Generative artificial intelligence: A systematic review and applications, Multimed. Tools Appl, pp. 1-40, (2024)
  • [3] Bzdok D., Thieme A., Levkovskyy O., Wren P., Ray T., Reddy S., Data science opportunities of large language models for neuroscience and biomedicine, Neuron, 112, pp. 698-717, (2024)
  • [4] Dave T., Athaluri S.A., Singh S., ChatGPT in medicine: An overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations, Front. Artif. Intell, 6, (2023)
  • [5] Wojcik S., Rulkiewicz A., Pruszczyk P., Lisik W., Pobozy M., Domienik-Karlowicz J., Beyond ChatGPT: What does GPT-4 add to healthcare? The dawn of a new era, Cardiol. J, 30, pp. 1018-1025, (2023)
  • [6] Rivas P., Zhao L., Marketing with chatgpt: Navigating the ethical terrain of gpt-based chatbot technology, AI, 4, pp. 375-384, (2023)
  • [7] An X., Chai C.S., Li Y., Zhou Y., Shen X., Zheng C., Chen M., Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools, Educ. Inf. Technol, 28, pp. 5187-5208, (2023)
  • [8] Generative AI to Become a $1.3 Trillion Market by 2032, Research Finds, (2023)
  • [9] Davis F.D., Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Q, 13, pp. 319-340, (1989)
  • [10] Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis F.D., User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Q, 27, pp. 425-478, (2003)