Increasing transparency and collaboration in scientific research: proposal for a matrix model to support the formulation of action programs for Open Science

被引:0
|
作者
Marques, Luana Farias Sales [1 ]
Sayao, Luiz Fernando [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Brasileiro Informacao Ciencia & Tecnol, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Comissao Nacl Energia Nucl, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源
RDBCI-REVISTA DIGITAL DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO | 2025年 / 23卷
关键词
Open science; Action gian; Matrix model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Introduction: Open science is a global movement that aims to transform contemporary science into a more collaborative, inclusive, and transparent enterprise, with the purpose of accelerating scientific progress. Historically centered on access to publications, the concept of open science expands to include the entire research cycle and all of its processes and products, and expandsto othersocial segments involving a plurality of actors. In this complex context, the challenge that arises is how to balance the various parameters, visions, and discourses involved in the development of policies, plans, and strategies. Objective: This paper discusses the visions and promises of open science and the technological, administrative, and sustainability infrastructures necessary for its implementation. Methodology: Based on exploratory and qualitative research, the technical and political bases of the model were extracted from reports by international organizations involved and by authors who discuss the topic. Result: As a result, a proposal for a matrix model is presented that supports the construction of action plans and strategies for achieving open science practices. Conclusion: It is concluded that despite the argument that science is essentially open, a large part of research products remain inaccessible and uninterpretable due to various restrictions, highlighting the need for sustainable strategies that promote the openness and accessibility of these data while respecting their particularities and restrictions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Increasing transparency and collaboration in scientific research: proposal for a matrix model to support the formulation of action programs for Open Science
    Marques, Luana Farias Sales
    Sayao, Luiz Fernando
    RDBCI-REVISTA DIGITAL DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2025, 23
  • [2] Open science practices in traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine research: A path to enhanced transparency and collaboration
    Ng, Jeremy Y.
    Wieland, L. Susan
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Liu, Jian-ping
    Witt, Claudia M.
    Moher, David
    Cramer, Holger
    INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [3] Open Science in eating disorders: Using current evidence to inspire a plan for increasing the transparency of our research
    Gorrell, Sasha
    Cohen, Shira
    Schaumberg, Katherine
    Anderson, Lisa Marie
    Reilly, Erin E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2023, 56 (05) : 925 - 932
  • [5] Developing the tasks-toward-transparency (T3) model for research transparency in open science using the lifecycle as a grounding framework
    Lyon, Liz
    Jeng, Wei
    Mattern, Eleanor
    LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 42 (01)
  • [6] Translation in action: Influence, collaboration, and evolution of COVID-19 research with Clinical and Translational Science Awards consortium support
    Llewellyn, Nicole
    Nehl, Eric J.
    Dave, Gaurav
    DiazGranados, Deborah
    Flynn, David
    Fournier, Deborah
    Hoyo, Veronica
    Pelfrey, Clara
    Casey, Shannon
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 17 (01):
  • [7] Developing a framework of scientific enquiry in early childhood: an action research project to support staff development and improve science teaching
    McNerney, Karen
    Hall, Nichola
    EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2017, 187 (02) : 206 - 220
  • [8] Towards strategic action planning: using a collaboration maturity model to support international co-operation in research and innovation
    Schimpf, Sven
    Christo, Nelson
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (ICE/ITMC), 2018,
  • [9] When Successful Action Research is not Legitimized as Scientific Contribution by the Central Sponsors: How can Morten Levin's Three Pillars of Action Research Support the Arch of Research Collaboration between Large Public Organizations and Universities?
    Dale, Stine
    Holmemo, Marte Daae-Qvale
    Kjaempenes, Wenche M.
    SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2024, : 613 - 626