Environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling and energy recovery pathways in the EU

被引:1
作者
Garcia-Gutierrez, Pelayo [1 ]
Amadei, Andrea Martino [2 ]
Klenert, David [1 ]
Nessi, Simone [2 ]
Tonini, Davide [1 ]
Tosches, Davide [2 ]
Ardente, Fulvio [2 ]
Saveyn, Hans G. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
关键词
Plastic waste; Mechanical recycling; Physical recycling; Chemical recycling; Energy recovery; Life cycle assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOLID-WASTE; MANAGEMENT; OPTIONS; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108099
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Physical and chemical recycling technologies are seen as key to increasing plastic recycling, although their potential environmental and economic impacts are not yet fully understood. This study provides a comparative environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling (mechanical, physical, chemical) and energy recovery, using primary data complemented with external information. Our findings suggest that for climate change mitigation, physical or chemical recycling constitute better alternative for processing plastic waste currently sent to energy recovery or landfill. This preference does not hold true for other impact categories given the current EU energy mix, but it is likely to apply in a future cleaner EU energy system. A clear ranking could not be established amongst mechanical, physical and chemical recycling as their environmental performance depends on the specific plastic waste fraction treated. The same applies for costs. The findings of this study can be used to support policy makers and businesses in their decision-making by establishing whether either recycling (mechanical, physical, chemical) or energy recovery of plastic waste are the preferred solution from an environmental and economic point of view.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Life cycle assessment of alternative technologies for municipal solid waste and plastic solid waste management in the Greater London area [J].
Al-Salem, S. M. ;
Evangelisti, S. ;
Lettieri, P. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 244 :391-402
[2]  
Andreassi Bassi S., 2022, Environmental and socioeconomic impacts of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) packaging management strategies in the EU, DOI 10.1021acs.est.1c00761
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 140442006 ISO
[5]   An LCA answer to the mixed plastics waste dilemma: Energy recovery or chemical recycling? [J].
Arena, Umberto ;
Parrillo, Francesco ;
Ardolino, Filomena .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 171 :662-675
[6]   Valorisation of polylactic acid (PLA) waste: A comparative life cycle assessment of various solvent-based chemical recycling technologies [J].
Aryan, Venkat ;
Maga, Daniel ;
Majgaonkar, Pranav ;
Hanich, Ronny .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 172
[7]  
Astrup T.F., 2012, 4 INT S EN BIOM WAST
[8]   Moving from linear to circular household plastic packaging in Belgium: Prospective life cycle assessment of mechanical and thermochemical recycling [J].
Civancik-Uslu, Didem ;
Nhu, T. T. ;
Van Gorp, Bart ;
Kresovic, Uros ;
Larrain, Macarena ;
Billen, Pieter ;
Ragaert, Kim ;
De Meester, Steven ;
Dewulf, Jo ;
Huysveld, Sophie .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 171
[9]   An environmental assessment system for environmental technologies [J].
Clavreul, Julie ;
Baumeister, Hubert ;
Christensen, Thomas H. ;
Damgaard, Anders .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2014, 60 :18-30
[10]   The application of Life Cycle Assessment to Integrated Solid Waste Management - Part 1 - Methodology [J].
Clift, R ;
Doig, A ;
Finnveden, G .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2000, 78 (B4) :279-287