Effect of Environmental Enrichment Within Cages on Production and Welfare in Laying Hens

被引:0
作者
Ozenturk, U. [1 ]
Uysal, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Fac Vet Med, Dept Anim Sci, TR-25240 Yakutiye, Erzurum, Turkiye
关键词
Egg production; laying hens; pecking stone; stress; welfare; HOUSING SYSTEMS; FEATHER PECKING; STOCKING DENSITY; EGG-PRODUCTION; KEEL BONE; NEST BOX; PERFORMANCE; KEPT; BEHAVIOR; STRESS;
D O I
10.1590/1806-9061-2024-2010
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study aims to compare the effects of conventional cage systems (CC) and environmentally enriched cage systems (EEC) (which include nest boxes, perches, and pecking stones) on the productivity and welfare of laying hens, also considering the responses of two genotypes- Hyline Brown (HB) and Isa Tinted (IT). A total of 280 hens were evaluated for production (egg production, cracked eggs, mortality), welfare (keel bone damage, feather score, health score, footpad dermatitis, body condition, beak and claw lengths), and stress (heterophile/lymphocyte ratio, tonic immobility). Hens in CC produced more eggs (p<0.01) but had a higher incidence of cracked eggs (p<0.001). Hens in CC exhibited more feather loss, comb and cloacal wounds, and footpad dermatitis (p<0.05), while EEC hens had more keel bone damage (p<0.01). HB hens had higher productivity (86.07% vs. 82.01%) and lower cracked egg rates (0.19% vs. 0.92%) compared to IT (p<0.01). IT hens had higher mortality and stress (p<0.001). Welfare indicators favored HB hens across all parameters, except footpad dermatitis (p<0.05). While EEC lowered egg production, the reduced cracked egg rate and better welfare outcomes, such as improved feather coverage and fewer injuries, suggest advantages. HB outperformed IT in productivity, stress tolerance, and welfare across both systems.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Welfare indicators in laying hens in relation to nest exclusion [J].
Alm, M. ;
Tauson, R. ;
Holm, L. ;
Wichman, A. ;
Kalliokoski, O. ;
Wall, H. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2016, 95 (06) :1238-1247
[2]  
Arpasova Henrieta, 2023, Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, V26, P243, DOI 10.15414/afz.2023.26.03.243-255
[3]   The Effect of Hard Pecking Enrichment during Rear on Feather Cover, Feather Pecking Behaviour and Beak Length in Beak-Trimmed and Intact-Beak Laying Hen Pullets [J].
Baker, Paula Elizabeth ;
Nicol, Christine Janet ;
Weeks, Claire Alexandra .
ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (06)
[4]   The effects of a perch, dust bath, and nest box, either alone or in combination as used in furnished cages, on the welfare of laying hens [J].
Barnett, J. L. ;
Tauson, R. ;
Downing, J. A. ;
Janardhana, V. ;
Lowenthal, J. W. ;
Butler, K. L. ;
Cronin, G. M. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2009, 88 (03) :456-470
[5]   Egg production in nests and nesting behaviour: genetic correlations with egg quality and BW for laying hens on the floor [J].
Becot, L. ;
Bedere, N. ;
Ferryb, A. ;
Burlot, T. ;
Le Roy, P. .
ANIMAL, 2023, 17 (10)
[6]   Effects of Perching on Poultry Welfare and Production: A Review [J].
Bist, Ramesh Bahadur ;
Subedi, Sachin ;
Chai, Lilong ;
Regmi, Prafulla ;
Ritz, Casey W. ;
Kim, Woo Kyun ;
Yang, Xiao .
POULTRY, 2023, 2 (02) :134-157
[7]   The utilization of the Welfare Quality® assessment for determining laying hen condition across three housing systems [J].
Blatchford, R. A. ;
Fulton, R. M. ;
Mench, J. A. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2016, 95 (01) :154-163
[8]   Plumage colour and feather pecking in laying hens, a chicken perspective? [J].
Bright, A. .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2007, 48 (03) :253-263
[9]   A review of environmental enrichment for laying hens during rearing in relation to their behavioral and physiological development [J].
Campbell, D. L. M. ;
de Haas, E. N. ;
Lee, C. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2019, 98 (01) :9-28
[10]  
Clark P., 2009, ATLAS CLIN AVIAN HEM