Cardiovascular effectiveness of newer glucose-lowering agents, with and without baseline lipid-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes: A systematic meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials and real-world evidence

被引:0
作者
Kunutsor, Setor K. [1 ]
Seidu, Borenyi S. [1 ,2 ]
Seidu, Samuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Leicester Gen Hosp, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Gwendolen Rd, Leicester LE5 4WP, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester, England
关键词
SGLT-2i; GLP-1RA; Type; 2; diabetes; Statins; Cardiovascular disease; Randomised controlled trial; MULTIFACTORIAL INTERVENTION; EMPAGLIFLOZIN; MORTALITY; KIDNEY; DISEASE; RISK; LIRAGLUTIDE; SIMVASTATIN; MECHANISM; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pcd.2024.09.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Whether the cardiovascular treatment benefits of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) differ by baseline use of statins/lipid lowering therapy is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether baseline statin use (users vs non-users) influences the cardiovascular and kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We identified relevant cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) and observational cohort studies from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and bibliographic searches up to March 2024. The analysis pooled study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes, categorized by baseline statin use status. We also assessed the interactions between these medications and baseline statin use by calculating and pooling the ratio of HRs (RHRs) within each trial. Results: Twenty-five articles (13 articles comprising 6 unique CVOTs and 12 articles comprising 9 unique cohort studies) were eligible. In CVOTs of SGLT-2is, the HRs (95 % CIs) of MACE; composite of CVD death or hospitalisation for heart failure; stroke; and kidney events in statin users were 0.90 (0.82-1.00), 0.78 (0.60-1.02), 1.00 (0.77-1.31), and 0.60 (0.53-0.69), respectively. The corresponding estimates were similar in non-statin users. In CVOTs of GLP-1RAs, the HRs (95 % CIs) for MACE in statin and non-statin users were 0.81 (0.73-0.90) and 0.92 (0.77-1.11), respectively. In observational cohort studies, SGLT-2is similarly reduced the risk of several cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in both statin and non-statin users. The estimated RHRs and p-values for interaction indicated that baseline statin use status did not significantly modify the cardio-kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs. Conclusions: Aggregate analyses of intervention and real-world evidence show that SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs provide comparable cardio-kidney benefits in patients with T2D, regardless of baseline statin use status. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024498939
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 598
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Real-World Treatment Patterns of Glucose-Lowering Agents Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease or At Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: An Observational, Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Study
    Nair, Radhika
    Mody, Reema
    Yu, Maria
    Cowburn, Stuart
    Konig, Manige
    Prewitt, Todd
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2022, 13 (11-12) : 1921 - 1932
  • [23] Assessing the benefit-risk profile of newer glucose-lowering drugs: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized outcome trials
    Tang, Huilin
    Zhang, Bingyu
    Lu, Yiwen
    Donahoo, William T.
    Ospina, Naykky Singh
    Kotecha, Pareeta
    Lu, Ying
    Tong, Jiayi
    Smith, Steven M.
    Rosenberg, Eric I.
    Kimmel, Stephen E.
    Bian, Jiang
    Guo, Jingchuan
    Chen, Yong
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2025, 27 (03) : 1444 - 1455
  • [24] Comparison of Glucose-Lowering Drugs as Second-Line Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gu, Shuyan
    Hu, Xiaoqian
    Zhen, Xuemei
    Shi, Lizheng
    Shao, Hui
    Sun, Xueshan
    Gu, Yuxuan
    Huang, Minzhuo
    Dong, Hengjin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (18)
  • [25] The efficacy and safety of novel classes of glucose-lowering drugs for cardiovascular outcomes: a network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
    Lin, Donna Shu-Han
    Lee, Jen-Kuang
    Hung, Chi-Sheng
    Chen, Wen-Jone
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2021, 64 (12) : 2676 - 2686
  • [26] Association of lowering apolipoprotein B with cardiovascular outcomes across various lipid-lowering therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis of trials
    Khan, Safi U.
    Khan, Muhammad U.
    Valavoor, Shahul
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Okunrintemi, Victor
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Leucker, Thorsten M.
    Blaha, Michael J.
    Michos, Erin D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (12) : 1255 - 1268
  • [27] Comparative effects of glucose-lowering agents on endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes: A network meta-analysis
    Kim, Hayeon
    Choi, Cheol Ung
    Rhew, Kiyon
    Park, Jiwon
    Lim, Yejee
    Kim, Myeong Gyu
    Kim, Kyungim
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2024, 391
  • [28] EMPA-REG and Other Cardiovascular Outcome Trials of Glucose-lowering Agents: Implications for Future Treatment Strategies in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Schernthaner, Guntram
    Schernthaner-Reiter, Marie Helene
    Schernthaner, Gerit-Holger
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 38 (06) : 1288 - 1298
  • [29] Comparison of New Glucose-Lowering Drugs on the Risk of Pancreatitis in Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Xuexue
    Wang, Miaoran
    Wang, Xujie
    Zhu, Zhengchuan
    Zhang, Wantong
    Zhou, Zhongyang
    Tang, Wei
    Li, Qiuyan
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (03) : 333 - 341
  • [30] Glycaemic control and macrovascular and microvascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials investigating intensive glucose-lowering strategies in people with type 2 diabetes
    Kunutsor, Setor K.
    Balasubramanian, Victoria G.
    Zaccardi, Francesco
    Gillies, Clare L.
    Aroda, Vanita R.
    Seidu, Samuel
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2024, 26 (06) : 2069 - 2081