Cardiovascular effectiveness of newer glucose-lowering agents, with and without baseline lipid-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes: A systematic meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials and real-world evidence

被引:0
|
作者
Kunutsor, Setor K. [1 ]
Seidu, Borenyi S. [1 ,2 ]
Seidu, Samuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Leicester Gen Hosp, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Gwendolen Rd, Leicester LE5 4WP, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester, England
关键词
SGLT-2i; GLP-1RA; Type; 2; diabetes; Statins; Cardiovascular disease; Randomised controlled trial; MULTIFACTORIAL INTERVENTION; EMPAGLIFLOZIN; MORTALITY; KIDNEY; DISEASE; RISK; LIRAGLUTIDE; SIMVASTATIN; MECHANISM; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pcd.2024.09.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Whether the cardiovascular treatment benefits of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) differ by baseline use of statins/lipid lowering therapy is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether baseline statin use (users vs non-users) influences the cardiovascular and kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We identified relevant cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) and observational cohort studies from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and bibliographic searches up to March 2024. The analysis pooled study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes, categorized by baseline statin use status. We also assessed the interactions between these medications and baseline statin use by calculating and pooling the ratio of HRs (RHRs) within each trial. Results: Twenty-five articles (13 articles comprising 6 unique CVOTs and 12 articles comprising 9 unique cohort studies) were eligible. In CVOTs of SGLT-2is, the HRs (95 % CIs) of MACE; composite of CVD death or hospitalisation for heart failure; stroke; and kidney events in statin users were 0.90 (0.82-1.00), 0.78 (0.60-1.02), 1.00 (0.77-1.31), and 0.60 (0.53-0.69), respectively. The corresponding estimates were similar in non-statin users. In CVOTs of GLP-1RAs, the HRs (95 % CIs) for MACE in statin and non-statin users were 0.81 (0.73-0.90) and 0.92 (0.77-1.11), respectively. In observational cohort studies, SGLT-2is similarly reduced the risk of several cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in both statin and non-statin users. The estimated RHRs and p-values for interaction indicated that baseline statin use status did not significantly modify the cardio-kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs. Conclusions: Aggregate analyses of intervention and real-world evidence show that SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs provide comparable cardio-kidney benefits in patients with T2D, regardless of baseline statin use status. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024498939
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 598
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cardiovascular and Renal Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists vs. Other Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies
    Caruso, Irene
    Cignarelli, Angelo
    Sorice, Gian Pio
    Natalicchio, Annalisa
    Perrini, Sebastio
    Laviola, Luigi
    Giorgino, Francesco
    METABOLITES, 2022, 12 (02)
  • [2] Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials of Glucose-Lowering Drugs or Strategies in Type 2 Diabetes
    Gerstein, Hertzel C.
    Shah, Reema
    ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 47 (01) : 97 - +
  • [3] Cardiovascular and kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs according to baseline blood pressure in type 2 diabetes: a systematic meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials
    Kunutsor, Setor K.
    Seidu, Samuel
    Dey, Richard S.
    Baidoo, Isaac K.
    Oulhaj, Abderrahim
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2024, 58 (01)
  • [4] Personalizing Glucose-Lowering Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease
    Inzucchi, Silvio E.
    ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 47 (01) : 137 - +
  • [5] Glycaemic control and macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials of novel glucose-lowering agents
    Kunutsor, Setor K.
    Zaccardi, Francesco
    Balasubramanian, Victoria G.
    Gillies, Clare L.
    Aroda, Vanita R.
    Seidu, Samuel
    Davies, Melanie J.
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2024, 26 (05): : 1837 - 1849
  • [6] Cardiovascular outcome trials of glucose-lowering drugs or strategies in type 2 diabetes
    Holman, Rury R.
    Sourij, Harald
    Califf, Robert M.
    LANCET, 2014, 383 (9933): : 2008 - 2017
  • [7] Three decades of glucose-lowering therapy in patients at high cardiovascular risk - A real-world analysis
    Neyer, Magdalena
    Vogel, Johannes B.
    Elsner, Pascal
    Kuehrer, Heike
    Saely, Christoph H.
    Muendlein, Axel
    Vonbank, Alexander
    Mader, Arthur
    Festa, Andreas
    Drexel, Heinz
    Leiherer, Andreas
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2024,
  • [8] Glucose-lowering drugs and heart failure: implications of recent cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes
    Cattadori, Gaia
    Pantanetti, Paola
    Ambrosio, Giuseppe
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 157
  • [9] Real-world use of cardioprotective glucose-lowering drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: A Danish nationwide cohort study, 2012 to 2019
    Funck, Kristian L.
    Knudsen, Jakob S.
    Hansen, Troels K.
    Thomsen, Reimar W.
    Grove, Erik L.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2021, 23 (02): : 520 - 529
  • [10] Glucose-lowering drugs or strategies, atherosclerotic cardiovascular events, and heart failure in people with or at risk of type 2 diabetes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised cardiovascular outcome trials
    Ghosh-Swaby, Olivia R.
    Goodman, Shaun G.
    Leiter, Lawrence A.
    Cheng, Alice
    Connelly, Kim A.
    Fitchett, David
    Juni, Peter
    Farkouh, Michael E.
    Udell, Jacob A.
    LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 8 (05): : 418 - 435