THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF ABUSIVE CEOS AND PHILANTHROPIC CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ON ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE

被引:2
作者
Yin, Jingfeng [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Ying [3 ]
Liden, Robert c. [3 ,4 ]
Kluemper, Donald [5 ]
Sauerwald, Steve [6 ]
Gu, Jibao [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, OBHR, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Illinois, Coll Business Adm, OBHR, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Coll Business, OBHR PhD Program, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Texas Tech Univ, Rawls Coll Business, Business Area Management, Lubbock, TX USA
[6] Univ Houston, Bauer Coll Business, Management, Houston, TX USA
[7] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Management, Hefei, Peoples R China
关键词
TRICKLE-DOWN MODEL; TOP MANAGEMENT; FIRM PERFORMANCE; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; UPPER ECHELONS; MEDIATING ROLE; DARK-SIDE; TEAM; SUPERVISION; PERSONALITY;
D O I
10.5465/amj.2022.0380
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine how and when chief executive officer (CEO) abusive leadership can undermine organizational innovation and performance by diminishing top management team (TMT)behavioral integration. Based on upper echelons theory and the related interface perspective, we analyzed cross-sectional survey data from CEOs and TMTs of 308 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Study 1 and multi-wave multisource survey data from CEOs and TMTs of 287 SMEs in Study 2. The empirical results support our theory. In addition, these effects are moderated by philanthropic corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiated by CEOs, such that CEO abusive leadership has a more substantial negative indirect impact on organizational innovation and performance when the level of philanthropic CSR is elevated. This moderation is attributed to TMT members' amplified negative perceptions of receiving inconsistent treatment, whereby the CEO treats external stakeholders favorably and internal executives poorly. The combined effects of CEO abusive leadership and philanthropic CSR on organizational innovation and performance add to the literature on abusive leadership, strategic leadership interfaces, and upper echelons theory.
引用
收藏
页码:1612 / 1633
页数:22
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
[2]   Globalization of Chinese Firms: Theoretical Universalism or Particularism [J].
Alon, Ilan ;
Child, John ;
Li, Shaomin ;
McIntyre, John R. .
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2011, 7 (02) :191-200
[3]   Symbolic Shareholder Democracy: Toward a Behavioral Understanding of the Role of Shareholder Voting in CEO Dismissals [J].
Andrei, Alina G. ;
van Oosterhout, J. Hans ;
Sauerwald, Steve .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2023, 34 (05) :1736-1758
[4]   TOP MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATIONS IN BANKING - DOES THE COMPOSITION OF THE TOP TEAM MAKE A DIFFERENCE [J].
BANTEL, KA ;
JACKSON, SE .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1989, 10 :107-124
[5]   Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility [J].
Barnett, Michael L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :794-816
[6]  
Barrabi T., 2023, New YorkPost,January 18
[7]   Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Stewart, GL ;
Neubert, MJ ;
Mount, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (03) :377-391
[8]   The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups [J].
Barrick, Murray R. ;
Bradley, Bret H. ;
Kristof-Brown, Amy L. ;
Colbert, Amy E. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (03) :544-557
[9]  
Bliese P.D., 2002, Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis, P401
[10]  
Bliese P.D., 2002, Multilevel random coefficient modeling in organizational research: Examples using SAS and S-PLUS