National inequality, social capital, and public goods decision-making

被引:2
|
作者
Skewes, Joshua C. [1 ,2 ]
Nockur, Laila [3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Linguist Cognit Sci & Semiot, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Interacting Minds Ctr, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Psychol & Behav Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
CURRENT RESEARCH IN ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY | 2023年 / 4卷
关键词
Inequality; Gini; Cooperation; Public Goods Game; Trust; Civic Norms; COOPERATION; DILEMMAS; TRUST; PARTICIPATION; PREFERENCES; PROVISION; BELIEFS; DECLINE; MODELS; GAMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100112
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Inequality affects how people make social decisions. Laboratory research has shown that when income inequality is simulated using cooperative economic games, groups with higher inequality often generate less wealth overall, with poorer group members receiving the worst outcomes. This study links these experimental findings to real world inequality and applies a decision model to explain the effects in terms of social decision-making dynamics. Using a pre-existing dataset from 255 groups playing a public goods game in thirteen economically diverse societies, we show that in nations with higher inequality, groups contribute less (Research question (RQ) 1). Further, we find that higher inequality is associated with lower optimism regarding others' contributions at the outset of the game and increased sensitivity to others' contributions, which accelerates the decay of cooperation (RQ2). These effects might be explained by national differences in social capital as expressed by trust and adherence to civic norms (RQ3). Using the European Values Survey, we replicate the negative association between inequality and contributions to a public good by examining national volunteering rates (RQ4).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE WELFARE STATE AND SOCIAL CAPITAL INEQUALITY
    van Oorschot, Wim
    Finsveen, Ellen
    EUROPEAN SOCIETIES, 2009, 11 (02) : 189 - 210
  • [32] Risk perception, trust and public engagement in nuclear decision-making in Hong Kong
    Mah, Daphne Ngar-yin
    Hills, Peter
    Tao, Julia
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 73 : 368 - 390
  • [33] The dynamics of competition and decision-making
    Morgan, Andrew J.
    Neal, Andrew
    Ballard, Timothy
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2024, 31 (06) : 2811 - 2822
  • [34] How Social and Nonsocial Context Affects Stay/Leave Decision-Making: The Influence of Actual and Expected Rewards
    Heijne, Amber
    Sanfey, Alan G.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [35] Toward a (more) parsimonious account of the link between 'dark' personality and social decision-making in economic games
    Hilbig, Benjamin E.
    Thielmann, Isabel
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2025, 20
  • [36] Identification and analysis of decision-making in the radiotherapy chain of care
    Genzling, A.
    Chauvin, B.
    Rohmer, O.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGIE, 2016, 10 (03) : 201 - 210
  • [37] Artificial fairness? Trust in algorithmic police decision-making
    Hobson, Zoe
    Yesberg, Julia A.
    Bradford, Ben
    Jackson, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2023, 19 (01) : 165 - 189
  • [38] Decision-Making Processes in Social Contexts
    Bruch, Elizabeth
    Feinberg, Fred
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, VOL 43, 2017, 43 : 207 - 227
  • [39] Aging is associated with maladaptive episodic memory-guided social decision-making
    Lempert, Karolina M.
    Cohen, Michael S.
    MacNear, Kameron A.
    Reckers, Frances M.
    Zaneski, Laura
    Wolk, David A.
    Kable, Joseph W.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2022, 119 (42)
  • [40] Online decision aids: the role of decision-making styles and decision-making stages
    Virdi, Preeti
    Kalro, Arti D.
    Sharma, Dinesh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RETAIL & DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 48 (06) : 555 - 574