Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students: A brief report of case-based clinical reasoning approach

被引:5
作者
Alavi-Moghaddam, Mostafa [1 ]
Zeinaddini-Meymand, Arman [2 ]
Ahmadi, Soleiman [3 ]
Shirani, Aryan [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Emergency Med, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Gastroenterol & Liver Dis Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Med Educ & Management, Tehran, Iran
[4] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Med, Tehran 196151178, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, USERN Off, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Best evidence medical education; clinical decision-making; clinical reasoning; medicine; undergraduate;
D O I
10.4103/jehp.jehp_355_23
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Case-based clinical reasoning (CBCR) is the proposed method to improve clinical reasoning. This brief report aimed to evaluate CBCR effectiveness to improve clinical reasoning via an online course. SETTINGS AND DESIGN:This study is a brief report of a before-after quasi-experimental study to evaluate CBCR in medical students of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Ten online weekly 2-hour sessions of CBCR presentations were instructed to medical students. Each session started with an illness script, and then, the instructor posed the students' five clinical questions in five steps according to the CBCR approach. The clinical reasoning ability of students was evaluated before and 2 weeks after the online courses using four types of standard clinical questions. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED:A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the difference between pretest and posttest examination scores. RESULTS:This brief report revealed that twenty-one medical students participated in all ten sessions of the CBCR online course and were evaluated in pretest and posttest examinations. A significant improvement in the clinical reasoning total scores in the posttest examination compared with the pretest examination was observed (P = 0.001). In terms of specific types of clinical questions, the mean posttest scores for clinical reasoning problem (CRP) and key feature (KF) examinations were higher than the pretest scores (P = 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Applying the CBCR approach improved the total clinical reasoning score of medical students during the course. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether this improvement would persist in workplace settings or not.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Methods for teaching medicine, Skeff KM, P17
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The Diagnostic Process. Improving diagnosis in health care, Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care
[3]  
Board on Health Care Services
[4]  
Institute of Medicine
[5]  
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, P31
[6]  
Cate O., 2018, Principles and Practice of Case-based Clinical Reasoning Education: A Method for Preclinical Students, P85
[7]  
Cate O., 2018, Chapter in a book: Introduction. Principles and Practice of Case-based Clinical Reasoning Education: A Method for Preclinical Students, P3
[8]  
Chandra N., 2018, Implementation of web-based educational tool to promote clinical reasoning in pbl
[9]  
Delavari S., 2020, Med J Islam Repub Iran, V34, p9.
[10]   Seven principles of effective case design for a problem-based curriculum [J].
Dolmans, DHJM ;
SnellenBalendong, H ;
Wolfhagen, IHAP ;
VanderVleuten, CPM .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 1997, 19 (03) :185-189