Evaluating the Performance of Satellite-Derived Soil Moisture Products Across South America Using Minimal Ground-Truth Assumptions in Spatiotemporal Statistical Analysis

South America (SA) features diverse land cover types and varied climate conditions, both of which significantly influence the variability of soil moisture (SMO). Obtaining ground-truth measurements for SMO is often costly and labor-intensive, and the limited number of ground SMO stations in SA further complicates the evaluation of satellite-derived SMO products. In this work, we proposed an approach that integrates some statistical methods to assess the reliability of Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP), the H113 dataset from the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT), and Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite-derived SMO products in SA from 14 May 2015 to 31 December 2016. The integrated methods are error metrics (correlation (R), bias, and ubiased root mean square error (ubRMSE)), Triple Collocation Method (TCM), and Hovm & ouml;ller diagrams. ERA5 and GLDAS-Noah SM products were used as references for validation. The quality of SMO products was assessed by considering environmental variables, including land cover, vegetation density, and precipitation, within the different climate zones of SA. The results presented that SMAP overall outperforms SMOS and ASCAT, with the highest average correlation (0.55 with GLDAS and 0.61 with ERA5), slight average bias (-0.058 with GLDAS and -0.014 with ERA5), and lowest average ubRMSE (0.045 with GLDAS and 0.041 with ERA5). In arid, semi-arid, and moderate vegetation regions, the SMAP satellite outperforms SMOS and ASCAT, achieving better statistics values with GLDAS and ERA5 datasets, and achieving low error variance and high S/N in the TCM analysis. While the ASCAT H113 product showed good performance, which makes it a good alternative to SMAP, it still has limitations in more dense vegetation regions. SMOS showed the lowest performance across SA, especially in the Amazon basin. The Amazon basin emerges as a critical region where all SMO products displayed a significant SMO variability; however, SMAP showed slightly better results than ASCAT and SMOS. In the absence of ground truths, the proposed approach provides a better evaluation of satellite SMO products. Meanwhile, it provides new spatiotemporal statistical insights into satellite SMO retrieval performance evaluation within diverse climate zones of SA. This research provides valuable guidance for improving SMO monitoring and agricultural management in tropical and semi-arid ecosystems.