Readability of Patient-reported Outcome Measures Used in Plastic Surgery

被引:0
作者
Zamore, Zachary [1 ,2 ]
Azad, Chao Long [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Lily [2 ]
Lowe, Chenery [3 ,4 ]
Giladi, Aviram M. [1 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Union Mem Hosp, Curtis Natl Hand Ctr, 3333 N Calvert St,JPB 200, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Soc, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Stanford Ctr Biomed Eth, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; DERRIFORD APPEARANCE; ONLINE RESOURCES; UPPER-EXTREMITY; SCALE DAS59; QUESTIONNAIRE; QUALITY; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000006351
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient-reported outcomes are essential to understanding success in plastic surgery procedures, many that aim to improve quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) should be written at or below the sixth-grade reading level recommended by the American Medical Association. This study aimed to evaluate the readability of plastic surgery PROMs. Methods: We conducted a literature review to identify validated, commonly used PROMs in plastic surgery. We extracted PROMs' text and instructions and analyzed readability using different approaches that estimate the grade level required to understand. Our primary outcome was the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) index, which detects word complexity and expects 100% comprehension at the grade level rating assigned. We also included the Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Coleman-Liau index, and automated readability index. Results: Forty-three PROMs met the inclusion criteria. The mean SMOG index was 8.2 (SD = 1.3), indicating an eighth-grade reading level. Mean reading grade levels measured by the Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Coleman-Liau index, and automated readability index ranged from third to sixth grade, although these may underestimate readability difficulties. Only 6 (14%) PROMs had a SMOG index at or below the sixth-grade level. PROM instructions had significantly higher reading levels than the questions/responses for all readability indexes (P < 0.01). Conclusions: PROMs used in plastic surgery, including the instructions, exceed the reading level recommended by the American Medical Association. This may limit comprehension and accurate completion and compromise validity and reliability. PROMs should be written and designed to be accessible to patients of all literacy levels.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
Ali R., 2023, MEDRXIV
[2]   Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Gender Confirmation Surgery: A Systematic Review [J].
Andreasson, My ;
Georgas, Konstantinos ;
Elander, Anna ;
Selvaggi, Gennaro .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 141 (04) :1026-1039
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 111th Congress (2009-2010)
[4]  
[Anonymous], Plain Language Action and Information Network
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, TIP 6 USE CAUTION RE
[6]  
[Anonymous], HLTH LIT
[7]   The health care experience of patients with low literacy [J].
Baker, DW ;
Parker, RM ;
Williams, MV ;
Pitkin, K ;
Parikh, NS ;
Coates, W ;
Imara, M .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1996, 5 (06) :329-334
[8]   Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Wright, JG ;
Katz, JN .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (05) :1038-1046
[9]  
Binkley JM, 1999, PHYS THER, V79, P371
[10]   DEVELOPMENT OF A EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER (EORTC) QUESTIONNAIRE MODULE TO BE USED IN QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENTS IN HEAD AND NECK-CANCER PATIENTS [J].
BJORDAL, K ;
AHLNERELMQVIST, M ;
TOLLESSON, E ;
JENSEN, AB ;
RAZAVI, D ;
MAHER, EJ ;
KAASA, S .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1994, 33 (08) :879-885