Combination of intrarectal heated lidocaine gel and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized trial

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Jung Im [1 ]
Sohn, Dong Wan [2 ]
Park, Bong Hee [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Yeouido St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijeongbu St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Urol, 1063 Ro, Seoul 07345, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Anesthesia; local; Biopsy; Pain; Prostate; COMPLICATIONS; ANESTHESIA; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.4111/icu.20240312
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the role of combined periprostatic nerve block (PNB) and intrarectal local anesthesia with heated lidocaine gel (ILAHL) in reducing pain during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy, compared with PNB alone. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective randomized trial with 140 participants who underwent systematic TRUS-guided, 12-core prostate biopsy from July 2021 to June 2022. These participants were divided into two groups. Before prostate biopsy, group 1 (n=70) received PNB and group 2 (n=70) received PNB combined intrarectal local anesthesia with 20 mL of heated (40 degrees C) 2% lidocaine gel. The primary outcome was pain score on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at four time points (VAS A: during local anesthesia procedure, VAS B: during probe insertion, VAS C: during biopsy procedure, VAS D: 30 minutes after biopsy). The secondary outcome included adverse events during and after the procedure. Results: Mean pain scores were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 at VAS A (2.53 vs. 1.60, p=0.001) and VAS B (2.47 vs. 1.49, p<0.001). The mean VAS C pain score in group 2 was significantly less than in group 1 (3.07 vs. 2.20, p=0.001), while there was no significant difference in the mean VAS D pain score between two groups (1.06 vs. 0.89, p=0.318). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of complications in both groups. Conclusions: The combination of PNB and ILAHL provides more effective pain control than PNB alone without increase of complication rates in patients undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 136
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparing use of lidocaine periprostatic nerve block and diclofenac suppository alone for patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
    Senturk, Aykut Bugra
    Yaytokgil, Muhammet
    Ekici, Musa
    Sari, Sercan
    Demir, Emre
    Cakiroglu, Basri
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 71 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [42] Combined perianal-intrarectal (PI) lidocaine-prilocaine (LP) cream and lidocaine-ketorolac gel provide better pain relief than combined PI LP cream and periprostatic nerve block during transrectal prostate biopsy
    Cormio, Luigi
    Pagliarulo, Vincenzo
    Lorusso, Fabrizio
    Selvaggio, Oscar
    Perrone, Antonia
    Sanguedolce, Francesca
    Bufo, Pantaleo
    Carrieri, Giuseppe
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (12) : 1776 - 1780
  • [43] Comparison of lidocaine suppositories and periprostatic nerve block during transrectal prostate biopsy
    Szlauer, Roman
    Goetschl, Robert
    Gnad, Andrea
    Meissner, Phillip
    Paras, Ljiljana
    Schmeller, Nikolaus T.
    Fink, Klaus G.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2008, 80 (03) : 253 - 256
  • [44] Periprostatic nerve blockade for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study
    Pareek, G
    Armenakas, NA
    Fracchia, JA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (03) : 894 - 897
  • [45] Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kim, Do Kyung
    Hah, Yoon Soo
    Kim, Jong Won
    Koo, Kyo Chul
    Lee, Kwang Suk
    Hong, Chang Hee
    Chung, Byung Ha
    Cho, Kang Su
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (04)
  • [46] Procedural Sedation and Analgesia as an Adjunct to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Doganca, Tunkut
    Savsin, Abdurrahman
    Erdogan, Sarper
    Altindas, Fatis
    Ozdemir, Fatih
    Ekici, Birsel
    Obek, Can
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2015, 43 (05) : 288 - 294
  • [47] Prospective comparison of the efficacy of caudal versus periprostatic nerve block, both with intrarectal local anesthesia, during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostatic needle biopsy
    Urabe, Fumihiko
    Kimura, Takahiro
    Shimomura, Tatsuya
    Onuma, Hajime
    Yamamoto, Toshihiro
    Sasaki, Hiroshi
    Miki, Jun
    Kuruma, Hidetoshi
    Miki, Kenta
    Egawa, Shin
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 51 (04) : 245 - 250
  • [48] Comparative evaluation of bilateral pudendal nerve blockade and periprostatic nerve block in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomised trial
    Aslan, Rahmi
    Erbin, Akif
    Eryilmaz, Recep
    Taken, Kerem
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 73 (02) : 140 - 145
  • [49] Lidocaine Suppository for Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy of the Prostate: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Study
    Goluza, Eleonora
    Hudolin, Tvrtko
    Kastelan, Zeljko
    Peric, Mladen
    Murselovic, Tamara
    Sosic, Hrvoje
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2011, 86 (03) : 315 - 319
  • [50] A Novel Pain Alternative for Patients with Anorectal Pathologies: The Comparison of Transperineal Prostatic Blockage Technique with Periprostatic Nerve Blockage and Rectal Gel Technique in Initial Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy - A Prospective, Randomized Trial
    Bolat, Deniz
    Degirmenci, Tansu
    Gunlusoy, Bulent
    Aydin, Erhan
    Aydogdu, Ozgu
    Ceylan, Yasin
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 97 (04) : 416 - 420