Combination of intrarectal heated lidocaine gel and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized trial

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Jung Im [1 ]
Sohn, Dong Wan [2 ]
Park, Bong Hee [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Yeouido St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijeongbu St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Urol, 1063 Ro, Seoul 07345, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Anesthesia; local; Biopsy; Pain; Prostate; COMPLICATIONS; ANESTHESIA; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.4111/icu.20240312
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the role of combined periprostatic nerve block (PNB) and intrarectal local anesthesia with heated lidocaine gel (ILAHL) in reducing pain during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy, compared with PNB alone. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective randomized trial with 140 participants who underwent systematic TRUS-guided, 12-core prostate biopsy from July 2021 to June 2022. These participants were divided into two groups. Before prostate biopsy, group 1 (n=70) received PNB and group 2 (n=70) received PNB combined intrarectal local anesthesia with 20 mL of heated (40 degrees C) 2% lidocaine gel. The primary outcome was pain score on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at four time points (VAS A: during local anesthesia procedure, VAS B: during probe insertion, VAS C: during biopsy procedure, VAS D: 30 minutes after biopsy). The secondary outcome included adverse events during and after the procedure. Results: Mean pain scores were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 at VAS A (2.53 vs. 1.60, p=0.001) and VAS B (2.47 vs. 1.49, p<0.001). The mean VAS C pain score in group 2 was significantly less than in group 1 (3.07 vs. 2.20, p=0.001), while there was no significant difference in the mean VAS D pain score between two groups (1.06 vs. 0.89, p=0.318). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of complications in both groups. Conclusions: The combination of PNB and ILAHL provides more effective pain control than PNB alone without increase of complication rates in patients undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 136
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of intrarectal heated lidocaine gel and periprostatic nerve block for pain control in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
    Jang, Hoon
    Moon, Hee Nam
    Kim, Jung Im
    Bae, Sang Rak
    Han, Chang Hee
    Park, Bong Hee
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 11 (01) : 8 - 12
  • [2] Combination of Perianal-Intrarectal Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream and Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control During Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Valent, Francesca
    Mogorovich, Andrea
    Manassero, Francesca
    De Maria, Maurizio
    Morelli, Girolamo
    Barbone, Fabio
    Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
    Selli, Cesare
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02) : 585 - 591
  • [3] The Effects of Combination Perianal-Intrarectal Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream and Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy of the Prostate: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Noh, Dong Hoon
    Cho, Min Chul
    Park, Hyoung Keun
    Lee, Hae Won
    Lee, Kwang Soo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (07) : 463 - 466
  • [4] The effect of heated lidocaine gel on pain reduction during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a randomized-controlled study
    Jung, Joon Se
    Moon, Hee Nam
    Kim, Jung Im
    Bae, Sang Rak
    Han, Chang Hee
    Park, Bong Hee
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 53 (12) : 2437 - 2443
  • [5] Combination of oral tramadol, acetaminophen and 1% lidocaine induced periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial
    Pendleton, John
    Costa, Joseph
    Wludyka, Peter
    Carvin, Dolly M.
    Rosser, Charles J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (04) : 1372 - 1375
  • [6] Nitrous oxide vs periprostatic nerve block with 1% lidocaine during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial
    Manikandan, R
    Srirangam, SJ
    Brown, SCW
    O'Reilly, PH
    Collins, GN
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) : 1881 - 1883
  • [7] A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: The Emory University experience
    Issa, MM
    Bux, S
    Chun, T
    Petros, JA
    Labadia, AJ
    Anastasia, K
    Miller, LE
    Marshall, FF
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (02) : 397 - 399
  • [8] A combination of intrarectal lignocaine cream plus periprostatic nerve block improves pain control in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A prospective evaluation
    Akdeniz, Ekrem
    Akdeniz, Sevda
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2018, 22 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [9] Anorectal application of 5% lidocaine cream reduces pain prior to periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: Randomized, prospective controlled study
    Rappaport, Yishai H.
    Kravchick, Sergey
    Neheman, Amos
    Beberashvili, Ilia
    Stav, Kobi
    Roizman, Shmuel
    Zisman, Amnon
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 55 (02) : 149 - 154
  • [10] Does the intrarectal instillation of lidocaine gel before periprostatic neurovascular bundle block during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies improve analgesic efficacy? A prospective, randomized trial
    Yun, Tae Jin
    Lee, Hak Jong
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    Seong, Chang Kyu
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (01) : 103 - 106