Toxicity and Efficacy of Different Target Volume Delineations of Radiation Therapy Based on the Updated Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/National Research Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Guidelines in Patients With Grade 3-4 Glioma: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Qiu, Yanfang [1 ]
Li, Yanxian [1 ]
Jiang, Cuihong [1 ]
Wu, Xiangwei [1 ]
Liu, Wen [1 ]
Fan, Changgen [1 ]
Ye, Xu [1 ]
He, Lili [1 ]
Xiao, Shuai [1 ]
Zhao, Qi [1 ]
Wu, Wenqiong [1 ]
Chen, Kailin [1 ]
Tan, Chao [1 ]
Li, Yuyi [1 ]
Wang, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Hunan Canc Hosp, Xiangya Sch Med,Dept Radiat Oncol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Hunan Canc Hosp, Xiangya Sch Med,Key Lab Translat Radiat Oncol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2025年 / 121卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
NEWLY-DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA; RADIOTHERAPY PLUS CONCOMITANT; PHASE-III; OPEN-LABEL; ADJUVANT TEMOZOLOMIDE; STANDARD TREATMENT; COMBINATION; FAILURE; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; BEVACIZUMAB;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.094
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of grade 3-4 glioma by comparing the updated Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/National Research Group (NRG) with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines for target volume delineation. Methods and Materials: A total of 245 patients with newly diagnosed World Health Organization grade 3-4 glioma were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to undergo postoperative RT with concurrent and maintenance temozolomide. The radiation target volume delineation was determined by using either the updated RTOG/NRG (n = 122) or EORTC guidelines (n = 123). The primary endpoint was the toxicity associated with treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were considered secondary endpoints. Results: No differences in low- or high-grade toxicities between the 2 groups, and neither group exhibited grade 5 toxicities. No significant differences in neurologic toxicities were observed between the RTOG/NRG and EORTC groups. The median PFS in the RTOG/NRG group and the EORTC group was 11.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-14.9 months) and 10.0 months (95% CI, 3.8-16.2 months), respectively (P = .73). The median OS in the RTOG/NRG group and the EORTC group was 19.5 months (95% CI, 14.2-24.8 months) and 18.5 months (95% CI, 12.8-24.2 months), respectively (P = .80). In patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma, there were no significant differences between the RTOG/NRG group and the EORTC group in median PFS (8.0 months [95% CI, 6.8-9.2 months] vs. 8.0 months [95% CI, 7.0-9.0 months], P = .38) and median OS (12.0 months [95% CI, 7.2-16.8 months] vs. 11.0 months [95% CI, 9.7-12.3 months], P = .10). Conclusions: Compared with EORTC principles, postoperative RT according to RTOG/NRG principles did not increase treat- ment-related toxicities and was equally effective for patients with grade 3-4 glioma, including the subgroup of patients with iso- citrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1168 / 1181
页数:14
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] TOXICITY CRITERIA OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP (RTOG) AND THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER (EORTC)
    COX, JD
    STETZ, J
    PAJAK, TF
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (05): : 1341 - 1346
  • [2] Development of clinical trial protocols involving advanced radiation therapy techniques: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiation Oncology Group approach
    Fairchild, A.
    Bar-Deroma, R.
    Collette, L.
    Haustermans, K.
    Hurkmans, C.
    Lacombe, D.
    Maingon, P.
    Poortmans, P.
    Tomsej, M.
    Weber, D. C.
    Gregoire, V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (07) : 1048 - 1054
  • [3] Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Consensus Panel Guidelines for the Delineation of the Clinical Target Volume in the Postoperative Treatment of Pancreatic Head Cancer
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Regine, William F.
    Dawson, Laura A.
    Ben-Josef, Edgar
    Haustermans, Karin
    Bosch, Walter R.
    Turian, Julius
    Abrams, Ross A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (03): : 901 - 908
  • [4] The Risk Assessment in Low-Grade Gliomas: An Analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria
    Andrea Lanese
    Enrico Franceschi
    Alba A. Brandes
    Oncology and Therapy, 2018, 6 (2) : 105 - 108
  • [5] The Risk Assessment in Low-Grade Gliomas: An Analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria
    Lanese, Andrea
    Franceschi, Enrico
    Brandes, Alba A.
    ONCOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2018, 6 (02) : 105 - 108
  • [6] A randomized trial on dose-response in radiation therapy of low-grade cerebral glioma: European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) study 22844
    Karim, ABMF
    Maat, B
    Hatlevoll, R
    Menten, J
    Rutten, EHJM
    Thomas, DGT
    Mascarenhas, F
    Horiot, JC
    Parvinen, LM
    vanReijn, M
    Hamers, HP
    Gaspar, L
    Noordman, E
    Pierart, M
    vanGlabbeke, M
    vanAlphen, AM
    Jager, JJ
    Fabrini, MG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 36 (03): : 549 - 556
  • [7] Randomized trial on dose-response in radiation therapy of low-grade cerebral glioma: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Study 22844
    Karim, A.B.M.F.
    Maat, B.
    Hatlevoll, R.
    Menten, J.
    Rutten, E.H.J.M.
    Thomas, D.G.T.
    Mascarenhas, F.
    Horiot, J.C.
    Parvinen, L.M.
    van Reijn, M.
    Jager, J.J.
    Fabrini, M.G.
    van Alphen, A.M.
    Hamers, H.P.
    Gaspar, L.
    et al.
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 1996, 36 (03):
  • [8] Prospective Randomized trial of low- versus high-dose radiation therapy in adults with supratentorial low-grade glioma: Initial report of a North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study
    Shaw, E
    Arusell, R
    Scheithauer, B
    O'Fallon, J
    O'Neill, B
    Dinapoli, R
    Nelson, D
    Earle, J
    Jones, C
    Cascino, T
    Nichols, D
    Ivnik, R
    Hellman, R
    Curran, W
    Abrams, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (09) : 2267 - 2276
  • [9] Androgen suppression plus radiation versus radiation alone for patients with stage D1/Pathologic node-positive adenocarcinoma of the prostate:: Updated results based on national prospective randomized trial Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31
    Lawton, CA
    Winter, K
    Grignon, D
    Pilepich, MV
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (04) : 800 - 807
  • [10] Patients with curative resection of cT3-4 rectal cancer after Preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy:: Does anybody benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy?: A trial of the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer radiation oncology group
    Collette, Laurence
    Bosset, Jean-Francois
    den Dulk, Marcel
    Nguyen, France
    Mineur, Laurent
    Maingon, Philippe
    Radosevic-Jelic, Ljiljana
    Pierart, Marianne
    Calais, Gilles
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (28) : 4379 - 4386