Antibacterial Properties of Garcinia mangostana Linn. Ethanolic and Methanolic Extracts Against Selected Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Fornal, Sienna Karen [1 ]
Subaldo, Sophia Nicole [1 ]
Saquido, Romeliza [1 ]
Nisperos, Dulce Marie [1 ,2 ]
Pag-ong, Anthony Ian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Far Eastern Univ, Inst Arts & Sci, Dept Biol Sci, Anim Res Lab, Manila 1008, Philippines
[2] Taylors Univ, Subang Jaya 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
来源
MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES | 2024年 / 20卷 / 06期
关键词
Antibacterial; Mangosteen; Escherichia coli; Staphylococcus aureus; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; INFECTION; XANTHONES; PERICARP; PLANTS;
D O I
10.11113/mjfas.v20n6.3480
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Garcinia mangostana Linn., has been studied for its antibacterial properties to augment commercial antibiotics and in the hope of easing reliance on these chemical medications in the future, however, the comparison of the fruit's bactericidal capabilities relative to different bacterial species requires further analyses. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the antibacterial activity of ethanolic and methanolic mangosteen extracts against three species that commonly cause Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs)- Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The results revealed no significant difference [mean difference: 1.42 (CI:- 3.53 to 6.37, I2 = 99%, Z = 0.56 (P = 0.57))] between the effectiveness of the extracts against S. aureus and E. coli. But it was contrary when P. aeruginosa was compared with S. aureus [mean difference: 5.00 (CI: 4.48 to 5.52, I-2 = 0%, Z = 18.97 (P < 0.00001))] and E. coli [mean difference: 3.96 (CI: 2.01 to 5.92, I-2 = 94%, Z = 3.97 (P < 0.0001))]. Literature search and screening were done following the PRISMA guidelines. Quality assessments utilized the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool and a remodified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 13 studies were included in the review, only 7 of which were eligible for meta-analyses. In conclusion, G. mangostana extracts are indeed effective against multiple microbes, however, relative to the selected bacterial species, inhibition varied. Moreover, this study sheds light on further practical or in vivo applications of mangosteen as a treatment for bacterial infections.
引用
收藏
页码:1317 / 1330
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antibacterial Activity of CNT-Ag and GO-Ag Nanocomposites Against Gram-negative and Gram-positive Bacteria
    Yun, Hyosuk
    Kim, Ji Dang
    Choi, Hyun Chul
    Lee, Chul Won
    BULLETIN OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 34 (11) : 3261 - 3264
  • [22] Antibacterial Effect of Carbosilane Metallodendrimers in Planktonic Cells of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm
    Llamazares, Celia
    Sanz del Olmo, Natalia
    Ortega, Paula
    Gomez, Rafael
    Soliveri, Juan
    Javier de la Mata, F.
    Garcia-Gallego, Sandra
    Luis Copa-Patino, Jose
    BIOMOLECULES, 2019, 9 (09)
  • [23] Phoenix 100 versus Vitek 2 in the Identification of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria: a Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
    Chatzigeorgiou, Kalliopi-Stavroula
    Sergentanis, Theodoros N.
    Tsiodras, Sotirios
    Hamodrakas, Stavros J.
    Bagos, Pantelis G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 49 (09) : 3284 - 3291
  • [24] In vitro antibacterial activity of extracts of Mimusops elengi against gram positive and gram negative bacteria
    Shahwar, Durre
    Raza, Muhammad Asam
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 3 (08): : 458 - 462
  • [25] Enhanced antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of silver nanoparticles against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria
    Gurunathan, Sangiliyandi
    Han, Jae Woong
    Kwon, Deug-Nam
    Kim, Jin-Hoi
    NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 : 1 - 17
  • [26] Layer-By-Layer Decorated Nanoparticles with Tunable Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Properties against Both Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria
    Ivanova, Aleksandra
    Ivanova, Kristina
    Hoyo, Javier
    Heinze, Thomas
    Sanchez-Gomez, Susana
    Tzanov, Tzanko
    ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, 2018, 10 (04) : 3314 - 3323
  • [27] Evaluation of Antibacterial Properties of Leaves and Barks of Rhizophora stylosa against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Organisms
    Gopal, Natesan
    Ekegbu, Jane
    Kaur, Christina Parvinder
    Paulraj, Ponnaiah
    Raji, P.
    Bhavya, Karanam Sai
    JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 13 (02) : 957 - 965
  • [28] Evaluation of the toxicities of silver and silver sulfide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
    Subramaniyan, Siva Bala
    Megarajan, Sengan
    Vijayakumar, Santhosh
    Mariappan, Mariappan
    Anbazhagan, Veerappan
    IET NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 13 (03) : 326 - 331
  • [29] Antibacterial Potential of Aloe weloensis (Aloeacea) Leaf Latex against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria Strains
    Emiru, Yohannes Kelifa
    Siraj, Ebrahim Abdela
    Teklehaimanot, Tekleab Teka
    Amare, Gedefaw Getnet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 2019
  • [30] Synergistic Effect of Lithocholic Acid with Gentamicin against Gram-Positive Bacteria but Not against Gram-Negative Bacteria
    Lv, Hongfa
    Wang, Lianping
    Liu, Shuang
    Hu, Wei
    Wang, Jianfeng
    Deng, Xuming
    Gao, Jinying
    MOLECULES, 2022, 27 (07):