Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for minimally invasive treatment of Achilles tendon rupture: Prospective single-center randomized study

BACKGROUND Achilles tendon rupture is a common orthopedic injury, with an annual incidence of 11-37 per 100000 people, significantly impacting daily life. Minimally invasive surgery, increasingly favored for its reduced risks and comparable fixation strength to open surgery, addresses these challenges. Despite advantages like accelerated recovery, perioperative care poses emotional support, pain management, and rehabilitation challenges, impacting treatment efficacy and patient experience. To address these gaps, this study investigated the efficacy of a rapid rehabilitation protocol in enhancing recovery outcomes for minimally invasive Achilles tendon surgery, aiming to develop personalized, standardized care guidelines for broader implementation. AIM To evaluate a nursing-led rapid rehabilitation program for minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair surgery, providing evidence-based early recovery indicators. METHODS This study enrolled 160 patients undergoing channel-assisted minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair randomized into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received perioperative rapid rehabilitation nursing care, while the control group received standard care. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry disability index score, with secondary outcomes including quality of life, Barthel index, patient satisfaction with nursing, incidence of complications, and rehabilitation adherence. Statistical analysis included appropriate methods to compare outcomes between groups. The study was conducted in a specific setting, utilizing a randomized controlled trial design. RESULTS All 160 patients completed the follow-up. The experimental group showed significantly greater improvements in key efficacy indicators: Postoperative Oswestry disability index score (8.688 vs 18.88, P < 0.0001), quality of life score (53.25 vs 38.99, P < 0.0001), and Barthel index (70.44 vs 51.63, P < 0.0001). The experimental group had a lower incidence of deep vein thrombosis (1.25% vs 10.00%, P = 0.0339) with a relative risk of 0.1250 (95% confidence interval: 0.02050-0.7421). Infection rates were lower in the experimental group (2.50% vs 11.25%, P = 0.0564). Hospital stay (5.40 days vs 7.26 days, P < 0.0001) and postoperative bed rest (3.34 days vs 5.42 days, P < 0.0001) were significantly shorter. Patient satisfaction was 100% in the experimental group vs 87.50% in the control group (P = 0.0031). CONCLUSION The rapid rehabilitation intervention significantly reduced pain, shortened hospital stays, and lowered complication rates, improving joint function and patient satisfaction.