Optimizing Quality Tolerance Limits Monitoring in Clinical Trials Through Machine Learning Methods

被引:0
作者
Yan, Lei [1 ]
Yu, Ziji [2 ]
Wu, Liwen [2 ]
Liu, Rachael [2 ]
Lin, Jianchang [2 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Stat, Tallahassee, FL USA
[2] Takeda Pharmaceut, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
关键词
Good clinical practice; Risk-based monitoring; Quality tolerance limits; Machine learning;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-025-00754-6
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
The traditional clinical trial monitoring process, which relies heavily on site visits and manual review of accumulative patient data reported through Electronic Data Capture system, is time-consuming and resource-intensive. The recently emerged risk-based monitoring (RBM) and quality tolerance limit (QTL) framework offers a more efficient alternative solution to traditional SDV (source data verification) based quality assurance. These frameworks aim at proactively identifying systematic issues that impact patient safety and data integrity. In this paper, we proposed a machine learning enabled approach to facilitate real-time, automated monitoring of clinical trial QTL risk assessment. Unlike the traditional quality assurance process, where QTLs are evaluated based on single-source data and arbitrary defined fixed threshold, we utilize the QTL-ML framework to integrate information from multiple clinical domains to predict the QTL of variety types at clinical program, study, site and patient level. Moreover, our approach is assumption-free, relying not on historical expectations but on dynamically accumulating trial data to predict quality tolerance limit risks in an automated manner. Embedded within ICH-E6 recommended RBM principles, this innovative machine learning solution for QTL monitoring has the potential to transform sponsors' ability to protect patient safety, reduce trial duration, and lower trial costs.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 578
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, REFLECTION PAPER RIS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, OVERSIGHT CLIN INVES
[3]   A simple and fast method for computing the Poisson binomial distribution function [J].
Biscarri, William ;
Zhao, Sihai Dave ;
Brunner, Robert J. .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2018, 122 :92-100
[4]  
Food and Drug Administration, 2023, RISK BASED APPROACH
[5]   Peering Into the Black Box of Artificial Intelligence: Evaluation Metrics of Machine Learning Methods [J].
Handelman, Guy S. ;
Kok, Hong Kuan ;
Chandra, Ronil V. ;
Razavi, Amir H. ;
Huang, Shiwei ;
Brooks, Mark ;
Lee, Michael J. ;
Asadi, Hamed .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (01) :38-43
[6]  
Hastie T., 2001, The Elements of Statistical Learning, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5, 10.1007/978-0-387- 21606-5]
[7]  
Hastie T. J., 1992, Statistical models in S
[8]  
Hastie Trevor, 2015, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability
[9]   Support vector machines [J].
Hearst, MA .
IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS & THEIR APPLICATIONS, 1998, 13 (04) :18-21
[10]  
International Committee for Harmonization, 2016, E6R2 INT COMM HARM