Supporting the spatial allocation of management practices to improve ecosystem services - An opportunity map approach for agricultural landscapes

被引:0
作者
Heiss, Irina [1 ]
Stegmann, Friederike [1 ]
Wolf, Matteo [1 ]
Volk, Martin [1 ]
Kaim, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Permoser Str 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Agri-environmental and climate schemes; Ecosystem services; Water quality; Carbon sequestration; Biodiversity; Drought protection; Maps; AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES; ORGANIC-CARBON; AGROFORESTRY; HETEROGENEITY; BIODIVERSITY; QUALITY; DEMAND; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113212
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ES) - the benefits people obtain from ecosystems - are affected by agricultural management. Often, they are degraded because of practices that solely aim at maximizing yield regardless of their impact on other ES, such as water regulation or habitat provision for biodiversity. Therefore, the spatial targeting of suitable agri-environmental schemes (subsidized by the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU) is needed to address degraded ES in specific areas. To study the interrelations and spatial patterns of ES and agricultural management, there is no compromise between time- and data-intense process-based models and rather simple ES maps based on land use types and single proxies. Therefore, we propose an opportunity map approach, which enables both regional overview and field-specific evaluation on where ES can be improved through agricultural management changes. For this purpose, we developed evaluation criteria and scores for site conditions, management data from 2022 and other spatial environmental parameters based on literature research and expert interviews. These evaluation criteria were assigned scores indicating the opportunity to improve the ES "provision of clean water", "habitat provision", "carbon sequestration" and "water regulation" (approximated by drought protection) through altered management. Individual criteria were developed for each ES and weights for the ES criteria resulted from expert interviews using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Except for the management data, all spatial data sets were publicly available. The study region of Northwest Saxony, Germany - an intensively cultivated agricultural area - showed an overall high opportunity to improve ES through management changes. The highest opportunities were identified for the ES "provision of clean water" and "habitat provision". This novel approach is fast, reproducible and can be transferred to and adapted for other German regions and ES. Therefore, it helps decision-makers to spatially target management suggestions and to support information campaigns or subsidy schemes for management practices with positive impacts on ES.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 132 条
  • [1] Conservation Agriculture Effects on Soil Water Holding Capacity and Water-Saving Varied with Management Practices and Agroecological Conditions: A Review
    Abdallah, Ahmed M.
    Jat, Hanuman S.
    Choudhary, Madhu
    Abdelaty, Emad F.
    Sharma, Parbodh C.
    Jat, Mangi L.
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [2] Effects of Fallow Management Practices on Soil Water, Crop Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat Monoculture System: A Meta-Analysis
    Adil, Muhammad
    Zhang, Shaohong
    Wang, Jun
    Shah, Adnan Noor
    Tanveer, Mohsin
    Fiaz, Sajid
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [3] Crop diversity benefits carabid and pollinator communities in landscapes with semi-natural habitats
    Aguilera, Guillermo
    Roslin, Tomas
    Miller, Kirsten
    Tamburini, Giovanni
    Birkhofer, Klaus
    Caballero-Lopez, Berta
    Lindstrom, Sandra Ann-Marie
    Ockinger, Erik
    Rundlof, Maj
    Rusch, Adrien
    Smith, Henrik G.
    Bommarco, Riccardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2020, 57 (11) : 2170 - 2179
  • [4] Long-term rewetting of degraded peatlands restores hydrological buffer function
    Ahmad, Sate
    Liu, Haojie
    Guenther, Anke
    Couwenberg, John
    Lennartz, Bernd
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 749
  • [5] Farm structure and environmental context drive farmers' decisions on the spatial distribution of ecological focus areas in Germany
    Alarcon-Segura, V.
    Roilo, S.
    Paulus, A.
    Beckmann, M.
    Klein, N.
    Cord, A. F.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2023, 38 (09) : 2293 - 2305
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2024, Opportunity mapping-Natural Capital Solutions WWW Document
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2023, ArcGIS Pro 3.1.0
  • [9] Evaluating alternative methods for biophysical and cultural ecosystem services hotspot mapping in natural resource planning
    Bagstad, Kenneth J.
    Semmens, Darius J.
    Ancona, Zachary H.
    Sherrouse, Benson C.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2017, 32 (01) : 77 - 97
  • [10] Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem service assessments: a case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains
    Bagstad, Kenneth J.
    Reed, James M.
    Semmens, Darius J.
    Sherrouse, Benson C.
    Troy, Austin
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2016, 16 (07) : 2005 - 2018