Choice versus no choice: Practical considerations for increasing choices

被引:0
作者
Kim, Ji Young [1 ]
Morris, Cody [2 ]
Ellsworth, Megan E. [2 ]
Liu, Xiaoyuan [3 ]
Seacord, Nicole F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ Harrisburg, Sch Behav Sci & Educ, Middletown, PA USA
[2] Salve Regina Univ, Dept Psychol, Newport, RI USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Teachers Coll, Hlth Studies & Appl Educ Psychol, New York, NY USA
关键词
choice; concurrent chains; concurrent operants; no choice; preference assessment; MAKING OPPORTUNITIES; DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT; DEVELOPMENTAL-DISABILITIES; PRESCHOOLERS PREFERENCES; SINGLE-OPERANT; CHILDREN; BEHAVIOR; EFFICACY; TASK; ARRANGEMENTS;
D O I
10.1002/jaba.2920
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Choice involves engaging in a selection response when multiple options are concurrently available. Choices can be incorporated into many components of behavior-analytic treatment such as providing clients with a choice between multiple items, activities, or tasks. We reviewed the main characteristics of 38 behavior-analytic articles that compared choice and no-choice conditions. We coded the experimental arrangements of choice and no-choice conditions and analyzed potential factors affecting preferences for choice and no choice. The findings suggest that the sizing of alternatives from which to choose, the timing of choice opportunities, and the timing of the delivery of the chosen option varied across the studies. Furthermore, preferences for choice shifted with differential reinforcement history and response effort manipulations of choice or no choice. The findings suggest that individual variables should be considered when providing choices, but more research is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 117
页数:18
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [11] Castillo M. I., 2022, BEHAV ANAL RES PRACT, V22, P143, DOI 10.1037/bar0000246
  • [12] Do persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities prefer to save the best for last in an MSWO? A preliminary investigation
    Castillo, Mariana I.
    Frank-Crawford, Michelle A.
    Liesfeld, Jody E.
    Doan, Trang M.
    Newcomb, Eli T.
    Rooker, Griffin W.
    Borrero, John C.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 37 (04) : 1133 - 1148
  • [13] Catania A.C., 1992, LEARNING, V3rd
  • [14] Effects of within-activity choices on the challenging behavior of children with severe developmental disabilities
    Cole, CL
    Levinson, TR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS, 2002, 4 (01) : 29 - +
  • [15] Improving oral reading fluency by influencing students' choice of instructional procedures: An experimental analysis with two students with behavioral disorders
    Daly, EJ
    Garbacz, SA
    Olson, SC
    Persampieri, M
    Ni, H
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS, 2006, 21 (01) : 13 - 30
  • [16] Teaching choice-making within activity schedules to children with autism
    Deel, Nicole M.
    Brodhead, Matthew T.
    Akers, Jessica S.
    White, Allison N.
    Miranda, David Ray G.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 36 (04) : 731 - 744
  • [17] Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences
    DeLeon, IG
    Iwata, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (04) : 519 - 533
  • [18] CHOICE MAKING TO PROMOTE ADAPTIVE-BEHAVIOR FOR STUDENTS WITH EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL CHALLENGES
    DNLAP, G
    DEPERCZEL, M
    CLARKE, S
    WILSON, D
    WRIGHT, S
    WHITE, R
    GOMEZ, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1994, 27 (03) : 505 - 518
  • [19] Shifting preferences for choice-making opportunities through histories of differential reinforcer quality
    Drifke, Melissa A.
    Tiger, Jeffrey H.
    Gifford, Margaret R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2019, 52 (01) : 227 - 239
  • [20] DETERMINING PRESCHOOLERS' PREFERENCES FOR CHOICE-MAKING OPPORTUNITIES: CHOICE OF TASK VERSUS CHOICE OF CONSEQUENCE
    Fenerty, Katherine A.
    Tiger, Jeffrey H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2010, 43 (03) : 503 - 507