Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Environmental Health Literacy Scale

被引:0
作者
Gundogdu, Nurcan Akguel [1 ]
Tosun, Alime Selcuk [2 ]
Gunal, Buesra Dagci [1 ]
机构
[1] Bandirma Onyedi Eylul Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Bandirma, Balikesir, Turkiye
[2] Selcuk Univ, Fac Nursing, Dept Publ Hlth Nursing, Konya, Turkiye
关键词
environmental health literacy; health sciences students; psychometrics; reliability; validity; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1111/jep.14289
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
AimThis study aimed to translate the Environmental Health Literacy Scale (EHLS) into Turkish and assess its construct validity and internal consistency.MethodsThis research employs a methodological design. The research was conducted during the 2022-2023 academic year with a sample of 500 students from the Faculty of Health Sciences. The data were collected via the introductory information form, the EHLS, and the Environmental Awareness Scale of university students. Subsequently, the data were transferred to the IBM SPSS Statistics 23 and IBM SPSS AMOS 23 software programs. Upon evaluation of the research data, frequency distributions for categorical variables and descriptive statistics for numerical variables were provided. Content validity was evaluated through the acquisition of expert approval. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed for scale validity, while Cronbach's alpha, test-retest and parallel form analyses were utilized for reliability.ResultsThe content validity index of the scale was determined to be 1.00. The scale is constituted of four discrete scales (general, food, air and water), each comprising three dimensions. In consideration of the fit indices, specifically the chi 2/df, GFI, TLI, IFI, CFI, RMSEA and SRMR, it can be concluded that the general, food, air and water scales are deemed acceptable. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the scales were found to be 0.70, 0.81, 0.83 and 0.79, respectively. In the parallel form analysis, a statistically significant positive relationship was identified between the scales.ConclusionsThe findings of this research indicate that the scale is a reliable instrument for assessing the environmental health literacy levels of undergraduate students enrolled in health sciences programs. It is anticipated that the scale will contribute to the advancement of environmental health literacy awareness.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
AKBAS I, 2019, KASTAMONU UNIV KASTA, V27, P1245, DOI DOI 10.24106/kefdergi.2973
[2]  
Alpar R., 2012, Applied statistics and validityReliability with examples from sports, health and education sciences
[3]  
Atabek-Yigit E, 2014, J BALT SCI EDUC, V13, P425
[4]   Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer [J].
Boateng, Godfred O. ;
Neilands, Torsten B. ;
Frongillo, Edward A. ;
Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R. ;
Young, Sera L. .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
[5]  
Budak S. N., 2023, Turkish Adaptation of Environmental Health Literacy Survey Instrument: Validity-Reliability Study
[6]  
Carducci A, 2022, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V32, pIII342
[7]   The Environmental Health Engagement Profile: What People Think and Do About Environmental Health [J].
Dixon, Jane K. ;
Hendrickson, Karrie C. ;
Ercolano, Elizabeth ;
Quackenbush, Robi ;
Dixon, John P. .
PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2009, 26 (05) :460-473
[8]   The Emergence of Environmental Health Literacy-From Its Roots to Its Future Potential [J].
Finn, Symma ;
O'Fallon, Liam .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 125 (04) :495-501
[9]   Knowledge and Beliefs Associated with Environmental Health Literacy: A Case Study Focused on Toxic Metals Contamination of Well Water [J].
Gray, Kathleen M. ;
Triana, Victoria ;
Lindsey, Marti ;
Richmond, Benjamin ;
Hoover, Anna Goodman ;
Wiesen, Chris .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (17)
[10]   From Content Knowledge to Community Change: A Review of Representations of Environmental Health Literacy [J].
Gray, Kathleen M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (03)