AN ALGORITHM TO SUPPORT THE SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPT REVIEW PROCESS WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF CHATGPT

被引:0
作者
Rashidov, Aldeniz [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Gabrovo, Gabrovo, Bulgaria
来源
STRATEGIES FOR POLICY IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION-STRATEGII NA OBRAZOVATELNATA I NAUCHNATA POLITIKA | 2024年 / 32卷 / 06期
关键词
Peer Review; Artificial Intelligence; ChatGPT; evaluation; SWOT analysis; algorithm;
D O I
10.53656/str2024-6-1-alg
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this work, an algorithm is proposed and analyzed to support the peer review process of scientific manuscripts with the assistance of ChatGPT. The study showed that the use of ChatGPT can significantly improve the efficiency and objectivity of the peer review process. The algorithm includes quantitative and qualitative evaluation steps, using weighting and SWOT analysis for better accuracy and depth of evaluation. The algorithm can be useful for scientific editors, reviewers, and authors who are looking for a way to increase the efficiency and objectivity of the peer review process and to obtain preliminary evaluation and feedback on their manuscripts. The proposed algorithm has the potential to transform traditional peer review methods, leading to a more efficient, objective, and detailed scientific manuscript evaluation process. Further research and refinement of the algorithm can improve its accuracy and adaptability, providing even greater value to the scientific community.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 681
页数:13
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Alrasheedy M. N., 2022, 2022 INT C CYB RES I, DOI [10.1109/ICCR56254.2022.9995902, DOI 10.1109/ICCR56254.2022.9995902]
[2]  
Gao CA, 2022, bioRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2022.12.23.521610, 10.1101/2022.12.23.521610, DOI 10.1101/2022.12.23.521610V1, DOI 10.1101/2022.12.23.521610]
[3]  
Hosseini M, 2023, RES INTEGR PEER REV, V8, DOI 10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5
[4]  
IRVINE A., 2024, Thesis link
[5]  
Kusal S, 2022, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2205.03235
[6]   A review on sentiment analysis and emotion detection from text [J].
Nandwani, Pansy ;
Verma, Rupali .
SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND MINING, 2021, 11 (01)
[7]  
RASHIDOVA F., 2023, 14 INT C EL EL ENG E, P1, DOI [10.1109/ELECO60389.2023.10415956, DOI 10.1109/ELECO60389.2023.10415956]
[8]   Is the future of peer review automated? [J].
Schulz, Robert ;
Barnett, Adrian ;
Bernard, Rene ;
Brown, Nicholas J. L. ;
Byrne, Jennifer A. ;
Eckmann, Peter ;
Gazda, Malgorzata A. ;
Kilicoglu, Halil ;
Prager, Eric M. ;
Salholz-Hillel, Maia ;
ter Riet, Gerben ;
Vines, Timothy ;
Vorland, Colby J. ;
Zhuang, Han ;
Bandrowski, Anita ;
Weissgerber, Tracey L. .
BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2022, 15 (01)
[9]   The limitations to our understanding of peer review [J].
Tennant, Jonathan P. ;
Ross-Hellauer, Tony .
RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW, 2020, 5 (01)
[10]  
TURNITIN, 2023, Turnitin turns on AI writing detection capabilities for educators and institutions (NA and EMEA)