Out with the Old, In with the Republicans? The Partisan Push of Legislative Term Limits

被引:0
作者
Butcher, Jordan [1 ]
机构
[1] Arkansas State Univ, Jonesboro, AR 72401 USA
关键词
Republican; elections; term limits; legislative; partisanship; INCUMBENCY; TURNOVER; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1017/S0898030624000095
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
Legislative term limits garnered public support because they promised to drain the swamp, removing entrenched incumbents from office. There is often a partisan dimension to this appeal since "the swamp" that is to be "drained" has often been controlled by one party for a lengthy period. However, it remains unclear to what extent term limits realign partisanship within US state legislatures. Using newly available turnover data, this research evaluates how legislative partisanship shifted after the implementation of term limits in state legislatures and continued over 20 years. The initial surge effects of term limits did appear to level the playing field between parties. The passage of term limits reversed party majorities in state legislatures, primarily benefiting newfound Republican majorities. These findings have important implications for current understandings of legislative term limits, as more states revisit these proposals, and provide insight into party trends at the state legislative level.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 47
页数:26
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], The Permanent Minority Party in American Politics
[2]  
[Anonymous], [FN381]. Supreme Court of Ohio Ohio Judicial Sys., Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar R. I 11(D)(5)(a)(i)-(iii) (2009), available at http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/LegalResources/Rules/govbar/govbar.pdf#Rule1 ("If an applicant has been convicted of a felony under the laws of this state, the laws of the United States, or the laws of another state or territory of the United States, or adjudicated a delinquent child for conduct that, if committed by an adult, would be
[3]  
(ii) The rights and privileges of the applicant that were forfeited by conviction have been restored by operation of law, expungement, or pardon
[4]  
(iii) The applicant is not disqualified by law from holding an office of public trust.")
[5]  
see also Supreme Court of Ohio Ohio Judicial Sys., Summary of Character and Fitness Process in Ohio, Special Provisions for Applicants with Felony Records (2010), available at http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/Boards/characterFit/CFProcess.pdf ("There is no per se bar to admission for applicants with felony records. However, an applicant who has a felony record must prove full and complete rehabilitation and satisfy special temporal and substantive conditions. The applicant is also subject to ad
[6]  
[Anonymous], The Permanent Minority Party in American Politics, P34
[7]  
[Anonymous], C EV, P140
[8]  
[Anonymous], 86 This over-simplified historical narrative of progression of confidence in PrEP (as measured by percentage) is present in the most recently-released U.S. clinical guidelines for PrEP. See, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: US Public Health Service, "Preexposure Prophylaxis for the Prevention of HIV Infection in the United States - 2017 Update - A Clinical Practice Guideline" (Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), March 2018), especially 19, 53.
[9]  
[Anonymous], Navigating Term Limits: The Careers of State Legislators
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Career opportunities are measured using the "Lower House Advancement Prospect Scores