What Worked for the U.S. Students' Learning During the Pandemic? Cross-State Comparisons of Remote Learning Policies, Practices, and Outcomes

This study provides critical policy insights into the U.S. students' academic achievement trends and the impacts of remote learning policies and practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Linking cross-state education assessment and survey datasets, it applies multivariate regression and case study methods to examine the relationship between remote learning policies and student achievement in reading and math. The results reveal large cross-state variations in outcomes along with regional patterns of in-person vs. remote learning policy divides. The states that adopted top-down, stringent school closure/reopening policies and relied more on remote instruction experienced relatively larger achievement declines. The government's funding support, teacher help, and home learning resources such as technology did not work. In contrast, the states that adopted flexible school closure/reopening policies with more in-person instruction reported smaller achievement losses. Further, students' digital literacy and remote learning self-efficacy such as online searching and help-seeking worked. The policy and research implications are discussed.