Data autonomy and privacy in the smart home: the case for a privacy smart home meta-assistant

被引:0
作者
Orlowski, Alexander [1 ]
Loh, Wulf [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Int Ctr Eth Sci & Humanities IZEW, Wilhelmstr 56, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Privacy; Smart home; Informational self-determination; Data protection; Transparency; Meta-assistant;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-025-02182-4
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, we focus on privacy risks in smart home environments and their implications for privacy and data protection. As with other Internet of Things (IoT) devices, the collection and processing of user data in smart home environments currently lack transparency and control. Smart home applications operate within the home, a space that is both morally and legally particularly protected and characterized by a implicit expectation of privacy from the user's perspective. In contrast to these higher privacy risks, the current regulatory efforts are not yet up to speed with respect to smart home environments. As an interim workaround solution, in this paper, we propose a meta-assistant for the smart home that increases users' data autonomy and thereby their privacy. In the first section, we give a brief overview of smart home applications, their data collection mechanisms, and the implications for user privacy. Following this, we argue in the second section that consent to datafication, i.e., the prevalent legal option to obtain legal grounds for data collection and processing, in most smart home contexts is-albeit legally sufficient-morally inadequate to provide meaningful possibilities for users to exercise their data autonomy and manage their privacy. The third section introduces an interim solution, outlining the possibility of a meta-assistant, which is capable of operating all other devices-if necessary, by shutting them off completely.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 89 条
[51]  
MacLean A., 2009, AUTONOMY INFORM CONS
[52]   What's up with Privacy? User Preferences and Privacy Concerns in Intelligent Personal Assistants [J].
Manikonda, Lydia ;
Deotale, Aditya ;
Kambhampati, Subbarao .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY (AIES'18), 2018, :229-235
[53]  
Marky Karola, 2020, MUM 2020: 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, P83, DOI 10.1145/3428361.3428464
[54]   "I don't know how to protect myself": Understanding Privacy Perceptions Resulting from the Presence of Bystanders in Smart Environments [J].
Marky, Karola ;
Voit, Alexandra ;
Stoever, Alina ;
Kunze, Kai ;
Schroeder, Svenja ;
Muehlhaeuser, Max .
11TH NORDIC CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, NORDICHI 2020, 2020,
[55]  
McAmis R, 2023, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 32ND USENIX SECURITY SYMPOSIUM, P2169
[56]   Evaluating the predictability of medical conditions from social media posts [J].
Merchant, Raina M. ;
Asch, David A. ;
Crutchley, Patrick ;
Ungar, Lyle H. ;
Guntuku, Sharath C. ;
Eichstaedt, Johannes C. ;
Hill, Shawndra ;
Padrez, Kevin ;
Smith, Robert J. ;
Schwartz, H. Andrew .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06)
[57]  
Mhlhoff R., 2020, KI als Laboratorium? Ethik als Aufgabe!, P38
[58]  
Miller FranklinG., 2010, The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice
[59]   Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach [J].
Mullainathan, Sendhil ;
Spiess, Jann .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) :87-106
[60]   Blur filtration fails to preserve privacy for home-based video conferencing [J].
Neustaedter, Carman ;
Greenberg, Saul ;
Boyle, Michael .
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2006, 13 (01) :1-36