Data autonomy and privacy in the smart home: the case for a privacy smart home meta-assistant

被引:0
作者
Orlowski, Alexander [1 ]
Loh, Wulf [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Int Ctr Eth Sci & Humanities IZEW, Wilhelmstr 56, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Privacy; Smart home; Informational self-determination; Data protection; Transparency; Meta-assistant;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-025-02182-4
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, we focus on privacy risks in smart home environments and their implications for privacy and data protection. As with other Internet of Things (IoT) devices, the collection and processing of user data in smart home environments currently lack transparency and control. Smart home applications operate within the home, a space that is both morally and legally particularly protected and characterized by a implicit expectation of privacy from the user's perspective. In contrast to these higher privacy risks, the current regulatory efforts are not yet up to speed with respect to smart home environments. As an interim workaround solution, in this paper, we propose a meta-assistant for the smart home that increases users' data autonomy and thereby their privacy. In the first section, we give a brief overview of smart home applications, their data collection mechanisms, and the implications for user privacy. Following this, we argue in the second section that consent to datafication, i.e., the prevalent legal option to obtain legal grounds for data collection and processing, in most smart home contexts is-albeit legally sufficient-morally inadequate to provide meaningful possibilities for users to exercise their data autonomy and manage their privacy. The third section introduces an interim solution, outlining the possibility of a meta-assistant, which is capable of operating all other devices-if necessary, by shutting them off completely.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Ahn S., Stream your brain! Speculative economy of the IoT and its pan-kinetic dataveillance, Big Data Soc, 8, 2, (2021)
[2]  
Apthorpe N., Reisman D., Feamster N., A smart home is no castle: privacy vulnerabilities of encrypted IoT traffic, (2017)
[3]  
Berlin I., Two concepts of liberty, Four essays on liberty, pp. 118-172, (1969)
[4]  
Blank S., What the GlobalFoundries’ retreat really means: things will never be the same for consumer devices, (2018)
[5]  
Brannstrom L., Gunneflo M., Noll G., Parsa A., Legal imagination and the US project of globalising the free flow of data, AI Soc, 39, pp. 2259-2266, (2023)
[6]  
Brignull H., 90% of everything: a paraphrased transcript of my talk at SMX Munich, (2013)
[7]  
Bronshteyn G., Searching the smart home, Stanford Law Rev, 72, pp. 455-501, (2020)
[8]  
Buchi M., Festic N., Latzer M., the chilling effects of digital dataveillance: a theoretical model and an empirical research agenda, Big Data Soc, 9, 1, (2022)
[9]  
Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI) (2024) Cybersicherheitsmonitor 2024
[10]  
Bzdok D., Yeo B.T.T., Inference in the age of big data: future perspectives on neuroscience, Neuroimage, 155, pp. 549-564, (2017)